Literature DB >> 16399771

Polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair genes, smoking and breast cancer in African Americans and whites: a population-based case-control study.

Leah E Mechanic1, Robert C Millikan, Jon Player, Allan René de Cotret, Scott Winkel, Kendra Worley, Kristin Heard, Kimberley Heard, Chiu-Kit Tse, Temitope Keku.   

Abstract

Polymorphisms exist in several genes involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER), the principal pathway for removal of smoking-induced DNA damage. An epidemiologic study was conducted to determine whether these polymorphisms modify the association between smoking and breast cancer. DNA samples and exposure histories were analyzed as part of a large population-based case-control study of breast cancer in North Carolina. The study population included 2311 cases (894 African Americans, 1417 whites) and 2022 controls (788 African Americans, 1234 whites). Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for breast cancer and smoking, and for breast cancer and nine non-synonymous coding polymorphisms in six NER genes (XPD codons 312 and 751, RAD23B codon 249, XPG codon 1104, XPC codon 939, XPF codons 415 and 662, and ERCC6 codons 1213 and 1230). Modification of ORs for smoking by single and combined NER genotypes was investigated. In this study population, smoking was more strongly associated with breast cancer in African American women compared with white women. Among African American women, the association of breast cancer and smoking was strongest among women with specific combinations of NER genotypes. Evidence for multiplicative interaction was found between combined NER genotypes and smoking dose (likelihood ratio test P = 0.06), duration (P = 0.09), time since cessation (P = 0.02), age at initiation (P = 0.04) and former smoking (P = 0.03). No interactions were observed in white women. Therefore, polymorphisms in NER genes may modify the relationship between breast cancer and smoking. These results are consistent with previous evidence of exposure-specific p53 mutations in breast tumors from current and former smokers, suggesting that smoking may play a role in breast cancer etiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16399771     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgi330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  48 in total

1.  Biomarkers of Psychological Stress in Health Disparities Research.

Authors:  Zora Djuric; Chloe E Bird; Alice Furumoto-Dawson; Garth H Rauscher; Mack T Ruffin; Raymond P Stowe; Katherine L Tucker; Christopher M Masi
Journal:  Open Biomark J       Date:  2008-01-01

2.  Cigarette Smoking and Breast Cancer Risk in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Women: The Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study.

Authors:  Avonne E Connor; Kathy B Baumgartner; Richard N Baumgartner; Christina M Pinkston; Stephanie D Boone; Esther M John; Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Lisa M Hines; Anna R Giuliano; Roger K Wolff; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Polygenic model of DNA repair genetic polymorphisms in human breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Tasha R Smith; Edward A Levine; Rita I Freimanis; Steven A Akman; Glenn O Allen; Kimberly N Hoang; Wen Liu-Mares; Jennifer J Hu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Time course analysis of gene expression identifies multiple genes with differential expression in patients with in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Santhi K Ganesh; Jungnam Joo; Kimberly Skelding; Laxmi Mehta; Gang Zheng; Kathleen O'Neill; Eric M Billings; Anna Helgadottir; Karl Andersen; Gudmundur Thorgeirsson; Thorarinn Gudnason; Nancy L Geller; Robert D Simari; David R Holmes; William W O'Neill; Elizabeth G Nabel
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.063

5.  Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and breast cancer risk in Russian population: a case-control study.

Authors:  Alexandra S Shadrina; Natalia A Ermolenko; Uljana A Boyarskikh; Tatiana V Sinkina; Alexandr F Lazarev; Valentina D Petrova; Maxim L Filipenko
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  The case-only independence assumption: associations between genetic polymorphisms and smoking among controls in two population-based studies.

Authors:  M Elizabeth Hodgson; Andrew F Olshan; Kari E North; Charles L Poole; Donglin Zeng; Chiu-Kit Tse; Tope O Keku; Joseph Galanko; Robert Sandler; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2012-11-15

7.  Complex association between ERCC2 gene polymorphisms, gender, smoking and the susceptibility to bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuanyi Wu; Yong Yang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-02-07

8.  Contribution of XPD (Lys751Gln) and XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) polymorphisms in familial and sporadic breast cancer predisposition and survival: an Indian report.

Authors:  Volga S Syamala; Vani Syamala; Hariharan Sreedharan; Praveenkumar B Raveendran; Ratheesan Kuttan; Ravindran Ankathil
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 9.  Eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair: from understanding mechanisms to influencing biology.

Authors:  Sarah C Shuck; Emily A Short; John J Turchi
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

10.  Evaluation of a candidate breast cancer associated SNP in ERCC4 as a risk modifier in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/BRCA2 (CIMBA).

Authors:  A Osorio; R L Milne; G Pita; P Peterlongo; T Heikkinen; J Simard; G Chenevix-Trench; A B Spurdle; J Beesley; X Chen; S Healey; S L Neuhausen; Y C Ding; F J Couch; X Wang; N Lindor; S Manoukian; M Barile; A Viel; L Tizzoni; C I Szabo; L Foretova; M Zikan; K Claes; M H Greene; P Mai; G Rennert; F Lejbkowicz; O Barnett-Griness; I L Andrulis; H Ozcelik; N Weerasooriya; A-M Gerdes; M Thomassen; D G Cruger; M A Caligo; E Friedman; B Kaufman; Y Laitman; S Cohen; T Kontorovich; R Gershoni-Baruch; E Dagan; H Jernström; M S Askmalm; B Arver; B Malmer; S M Domchek; K L Nathanson; J Brunet; T Ramón Y Cajal; D Yannoukakos; U Hamann; F B L Hogervorst; S Verhoef; E B Gómez García; J T Wijnen; A van den Ouweland; D F Easton; S Peock; M Cook; C T Oliver; D Frost; C Luccarini; D G Evans; F Lalloo; R Eeles; G Pichert; J Cook; S Hodgson; P J Morrison; F Douglas; A K Godwin; O M Sinilnikova; L Barjhoux; D Stoppa-Lyonnet; V Moncoutier; S Giraud; C Cassini; L Olivier-Faivre; F Révillion; J-P Peyrat; D Muller; J-P Fricker; H T Lynch; E M John; S Buys; M Daly; J L Hopper; M B Terry; A Miron; Y Yassin; D Goldgar; C F Singer; D Gschwantler-Kaulich; G Pfeiler; A-C Spiess; Thomas V O Hansen; O T Johannsson; T Kirchhoff; K Offit; K Kosarin; M Piedmonte; G C Rodriguez; K Wakeley; J F Boggess; J Basil; P E Schwartz; S V Blank; A E Toland; M Montagna; C Casella; E N Imyanitov; A Allavena; R K Schmutzler; B Versmold; C Engel; A Meindl; N Ditsch; N Arnold; D Niederacher; H Deissler; B Fiebig; R Varon-Mateeva; D Schaefer; U G Froster; T Caldes; M de la Hoya; L McGuffog; A C Antoniou; H Nevanlinna; P Radice; J Benítez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.