Literature DB >> 16399525

Pediatric bridge to heart transplantation: application of the Berlin Heart, Medos and Thoratec ventricular assist devices.

Francisco A Arabía1, Pei H Tsau, Richard G Smith, Paul E Nolan, Venki Paramesh, Raj K Bose, Daniel S Woolley, Gulshan K Sethi, Birger E Rhenman, Jack G Copeland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bridge to transplantation (BTT) is an accepted option when a donor heart is not available. Extensive clinical study has been done with BTT in the adult population, but comparatively fewer data are available in the pediatric population with regard to pulsatile devices.
METHODS: Ten pediatric patients are presented, all of whom underwent BTT or recovery with pneumatic paracorporeal systems. The Berlin Heart bi-ventricular assist device (BVAD) was utilized in 1 patient, the Medos VAD in 4 patients (1 left ventricular assist device [LVAD], 3 BVADs) and the Thoratec VAD in 5 patients (3 BVADs, 2 LVADs). The pediatric population consisted of 3 females and 7 males. Mean age of the population was 7.4 years, weight 25 kg and body surface area (BSA) 0.88 m(2). Etiology for heart failure consisted of 4 viral, 3 congenital and 3 idiopathic cardiomyopathies. Before implant, all patients had evidence of progressive cardiac failure despite inotropic support, and 2 patients had been on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Mean duration on the device was 34.3 days (8 to 107 days).
RESULTS: Two patients suffered stroke and recovered without sequelae. Two patients died of ischemic stroke and 1 of sepsis. Seven patients survived (6 transplanted and 1 weaned) for a survival rate of 70% compared with survival for ECMO as BTT, which was 40% to 50%. All survivors had complications related to bleeding, thromboembolic events and infections.
CONCLUSIONS: The Thoratec VAD can be placed in small patients with large hearts that can accommodate the available cannulas. The Berlin Heart and the Medos VAD have a selection of ventricles with small stroke volumes. All 3 systems can be used successfully in the pediatric population as BTT with better survival than with ECMO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16399525     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  12 in total

1.  An in vitro fluid dynamic study of pediatric cannulae: the value of animal studies to predict human flow.

Authors:  Tobias C Long; Joseph J Pearson; Andrew C Hankinson; Steven Deutsch; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul Monagle; Anthony K C Chan; Neil A Goldenberg; Rebecca N Ichord; Janna M Journeycake; Ulrike Nowak-Göttl; Sara K Vesely
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Prolonged Use of Levitronix Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Shih-Ying Sung; Po-Shun Hsu; Jia-Lin Chen; Chien-Sung Tsai; Yi-Ting Tsai; Chih-Yuan Lin; Chung-Yi Lee; Hong-Yan Ke; Yi-Chang Lin
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.672

4.  Flow visualization of a pediatric ventricular assist device during stroke volume reductions related to weaning.

Authors:  Breigh N Roszelle; Steven Deutsch; William J Weiss; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Left ventricular assist device support with a centrifugal pump for 2 months in a 5-kg child.

Authors:  Takafumi Inoue; Takashi Nishimura; Arata Murakami; Keiichi Itatani; Tetsuhiro Takaoka; Kazuo Kitahori; Akihide Umeki; Toshiko Takezoe; Koichi Kashiwa; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Pediatric Mechanical Support with an External Cardiac Compression Device.

Authors:  Minoo N Kavarana; Howard M Loree; Robert B Stewart; Michael T Milbocker; Robert L Hannan; George M Pantalos; Robert Tv Kung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dis Diagn       Date:  2013

7.  Mechanical circulatory support of the critically ill child awaiting heart transplantation.

Authors:  Avihu Z Gazit; Sanjiv K Gandhi; Charles C Canter
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2010-02

8.  The role of extracorporeal life support in acute myocarditis: a bridge to recovery?

Authors:  D Bradford Sanders; Steven R Sowell; Brigham Willis; John Lane; Christopher Pierce; Stephen Pophal; Francisco A Arabia; John J Nigro
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-12

9.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus counterpulsatile, pulsatile, and continuous left ventricular unloading for pediatric mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Carlo R Bartoli; Steven C Koenig; Constantine Ionan; Kevin J Gillars; Mike E Mitchell; Erle H Austin; Laman A Gray; George M Pantalos
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.624

10.  Bridge to transplantation with a Toyobo-NCVC left ventricular assist device in a 3-year-old girl.

Authors:  Ayumu Masuoka; Toshiyuki Katogi; Mika Iwazaki; Toshiki Kobayashi; Takashi Nishimura; Shunei Kyo
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.