Literature DB >> 16397811

Target-related coupling in bimanual reaching movements.

Matthias Weigelt1, Martina Rieger, Franz Mechsner, Wolfgang Prinz.   

Abstract

While bimanual interference effects can be observed when symbolic cues indicate the parameter values of simultaneous reaching movements, these effects disappear under conditions in which the target locations of two movements are cued directly. The present study investigates the generalizability of these target-location cuing benefits to conditions in which symbolic cues are used to indicate target locations (i.e., the end points of bimanual movements). Participants were asked to move to two of four possible target locations, being located either at the same and different distances (Experiment 1), or in the same and different directions (Experiment 2). Circles and crosses served as symbolic target-location cues and were arranged in a symmetric or non-symmetric fashion over the four target locations. Each trial was preceded by a variable precuing interval. Results revealed faster initiation times for equivalent as compared to non-equivalent target locations (same vs. different cues). Moreover, the time course of prepartion suggests that this effect is in fact due to target-equivalence and not to cue-similarity. Bimanual interference relative to movement parameter values was not observed. These findings suggest that cuing target locations can dominate potential intermanual interference effects during the concurrent programming of different movement parameter values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16397811     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0043-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  13 in total

1.  Bimanual coupling during the specification of isometric forces.

Authors:  C Steglich; H Heuer; W Spijkers; T Kleinsorge
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Brief bimanual force pulses: correlations between the hands in force and time.

Authors:  G Rinkenauer; R Ulrich; A M Wing
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions.

Authors:  J Diedrichsen; E Hazeltine; S Kennerley; R B Ivry
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

4.  Bimanual interference associated with the selection of target locations.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Richard B Ivry; Eliot Hazeltine; Steven Kennerley; Asher Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Joern Diedrichsen; Steven W Kennerley; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2002-11-26

Review 6.  The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models.

Authors:  Simone Cardoso de Oliveira
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2002-06

7.  End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation.

Authors:  Matthias Weigelt; Wilfried Kunde; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

8.  The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes.

Authors:  H Heuer; W Spijkers; T Kleinsorge; H van der Loo; C Steglich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Structural constraints on bimanual movements.

Authors:  H Heuer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

10.  Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12
View more
  16 in total

1.  What to do and how to do it: action representations in tool use.

Authors:  Cristina Massen; Christine Sattler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Goal congruency without stimulus congruency in bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Henrike Krauss; Matthias Weigelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-03-05

3.  Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Erin K Cressman; Ian M Franks; Mark G Carpenter; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Dissecting the response in response-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Movement order and saccade direction affect a common measure of eye-hand coordination in bimanual reaching.

Authors:  Eric Mooshagian; Cunguo Wang; Afreen Ferdoash; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Jeffrey M Haddad; Elizabeth A Franz; Howard N Zelaznik; Joong Hyun Ryu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Coordinative constraints in bimanual tool use.

Authors:  Cristina Massen; Christine Sattler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance.

Authors:  Loes Janssen; Marieke Beuting; Ruud Meulenbroek; Bert Steenbergen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Prospective coding in event representation.

Authors:  Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-04-04

10.  Effects of angular shift transformations between movements and their visual feedback on coordination in unimanual circling.

Authors:  Martina Rieger; Sandra Dietrich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.