Literature DB >> 16396975

Focal peritubular capillary C4d deposition in acute rejection.

Alexander B Magil1, Kathryn J Tinckam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diffuse peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition has been shown to be associated with relatively poor graft outcome. The significance of focal PTC C4d staining in the early post-transplant period is uncertain.
METHODS: Sixty-five biopsies from 53 patients with acute rejection were graded (Banff '97 criteria), stained for C4d, monocytes and T cells, and divided into three groups according to PTC C4d: (i) focal C4d (F) (14 biopsies, 14 patients), (ii) diffuse C4d (D) (23 biopsies, 15 patients) and (iii) no C4d (N) (28 biopsies, 24 patients). The three groups were compared with respect to a variety of biopsy and clinical parameters including outcome.
RESULTS: The incidence of transplant glomerulitis and glomerular monocyte infiltration were significantly greater in F (64% and 2.0+/-2.0) and D (57% and 3.4+/-2.0) than in N (11% and 0.2+/-0.2). A significantly higher proportion of F (93%) demonstrated acute cellular rejection (Banff '97 grade > or = 1A) than did D (35%). The F and D groups included significantly more females (50 and 67%, respectively) than did N (21%). The percentage of patients with a second or third transplant was higher in F (29%) and D (40%) than in N (8%) (P = 0.0589). The proportion of patients with glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min at 12, 24 and 48 months was higher in the D and F groups than in the N, and there was a statistically significant increasing trend in odds of this outcome occurring at 48 months across the three groups (D > F > N group) (P = 0.0416).
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the biopsy findings and clinical course in patients with focal PTC C4d staining are similar to those associated with diffuse C4d.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16396975     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfk028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Alloantibodies-mediated kidney transplant rejection: a pair of continuing approaches, and with nonetheless many open questions].

Authors:  Georg Böhmig
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Effector mechanisms of rejection.

Authors:  Aurélie Moreau; Emilie Varey; Ignacio Anegon; Maria-Cristina Cuturi
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  C4d staining in renal allograft biopsies with early acute rejection and subsequent clinical outcome.

Authors:  Johanna M Botermans; Hanneke de Kort; Michael Eikmans; Klaas Koop; Hans J Baelde; Marko J K Mallat; Kim Zuidwijk; Cees van Kooten; Emile de Heer; Natascha N T Goemaere; Frans H J Claas; Jan A Bruijn; Johan W de Fijter; Ingeborg M Bajema; Marian C van Groningen
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Gene Expression in Biopsies of Acute Rejection and Interstitial Fibrosis/Tubular Atrophy Reveals Highly Shared Mechanisms That Correlate With Worse Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  B D Modena; S M Kurian; L W Gaber; J Waalen; A I Su; T Gelbart; T S Mondala; S R Head; S Papp; R Heilman; J J Friedewald; S M Flechner; C L Marsh; R S Sung; H Shidban; L Chan; M M Abecassis; D R Salomon
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Focal C4d+ in renal allografts is associated with the presence of donor-specific antibodies and decreased allograft survival.

Authors:  R L Kedainis; M J Koch; D C Brennan; H Liapis
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of bovine blood monocytes.

Authors:  Jamal Hussen; Anna Düvel; Olivier Sandra; David Smith; Iain Martin Sheldon; Peter Zieger; Hans-Joachim Schuberth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.