Literature DB >> 16393817

Sample comminution for mycotoxin analysis: dry milling or slurry mixing?

M C Spanjer1, J M Scholten, S Kastrup, U Jörissen, T F Schatzki, N Toyofuku.   

Abstract

A comparison was made between dry milling and slurry mixing as a comminuting step preceding mycotoxin analysis. Sample schemes of up to 30 kg are mandated by European Commission legislation. Cocoa, green coffee, almonds and pistachio samples of 10 kg were milled by a Romer analytical sampling mill and all three subsamples were analysed for aflatoxin B1 or ochratoxin A content. The homogenization process was evaluated in terms of the analytical results, coefficients of variation for different mills and particle size distributions. Coefficients of variation for the comminuting step were higher for dry milling than for slurry mixing. This difference was explained based on measured particle size distributions for both milling types. Measurements also showed slight differences in mycotoxin content of samples based on milling procedures. This might lead to lots being wrongly accepted or rejected based on an erroneous subsample result. It was concluded that sample comminution was best performed by slurry mixing, which produced smaller particles and, consequently, homogeneous samples with lowest coefficients of variation. Additional data are given on analytical results in 10-kg subsamples that originate from the aggregate 30-kg sample as described in Commission Directive 98/53/EC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16393817     DOI: 10.1080/02652030500260439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Addit Contam        ISSN: 0265-203X


  7 in total

1.  Investigation of the distribution of deoxynivalenol and ochratoxin A contamination within a 26 t truckload of wheat kernels.

Authors:  S Biselli; C Persin; M Syben
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.833

Review 2.  Sampling of cereals and cereal-based foods for the determination of ochratoxin A: an overview.

Authors:  S A Tittlemier; E Varga; P M Scott; R Krska
Journal:  Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess       Date:  2011-06

3.  A Greener, Quick and Comprehensive Extraction Approach for LC-MS of Multiple Mycotoxins.

Authors:  Andreas Breidbach
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 4.  A Review: Sample Preparation and Chromatographic Technologies for Detection of Aflatoxins in Foods.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Kaushik Banerjee
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 5.  An overview of conventional and emerging analytical methods for the determination of mycotoxins.

Authors:  Irena Kralj Cigić; Helena Prosen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Improved Sample Selection and Preparation Methods for Sampling Plans Used to Facilitate Rapid and Reliable Estimation of Aflatoxin in Chicken Feed.

Authors:  James Kibugu; Raymond Mdachi; Leonard Munga; David Mburu; Thomas Whitaker; Thu P Huynh; Delia Grace; Johanna F Lindahl
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 7.  The Existing Methods and Novel Approaches in Mycotoxins' Detection.

Authors:  Edyta Janik; Marcin Niemcewicz; Marcin Podogrocki; Michal Ceremuga; Leslaw Gorniak; Maksymilian Stela; Michal Bijak
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.