Literature DB >> 16391559

Transmission ratio distortion in the myotonic dystrophy locus in human preimplantation embryos.

Nicola L Dean1, J Concepción Loredo-Osti, T Mary Fujiwara, Kenneth Morgan, Seang Lin Tan, Anna K Naumova, Asangla Ao.   

Abstract

One form of myotonic dystrophy, dystrophia myotonica 1 (DM1), is caused by the expansion of a (CTG)(n) repeat within the dystrophia myotonica-protein kinase (DMPK) gene located in chromosome region 19q13.3. Unaffected individuals carry alleles with repeat size (CTG)(5-37), premutation carriers (CTG)(38-49) and DM1 affected individuals (CTG)(50-6,000). Preferential transmission both of expanded repeats from DM1-affected parents and larger DMPK alleles in the normal-size range have been reported in live-born offspring. To determine the moment in development when transmission ratio distortion (TRD) for larger normal-size DMPK alleles is generated, the transmission from heterozygous parents with one repeat within the (CTG)(5-18) range (Group I repeat) and the other within the (CTG)(19-37) range (Group II repeat) to human preimplantation embryos was analysed. A statistically significant TRD of 59% (95% confidence interval of 54-64) in favour of Group II repeats from both mothers and fathers was observed in preimplantation embryos, which remained significant when female embryos were considered separately. In contrast, no significant TRD was detected for repeats from informative Group I/Group I parents. Our analysis showed that Group II repeats specifically were preferentially transmitted in human preimplantation embryos. We suggest that TRD, in Group II repeats at the DMPK locus, is likely to result from events occurring at or around the time of fertilisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16391559     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  12 in total

1.  Analysis of case-parent trios for imprinting effect using a loglinear model with adjustment for sex-of-parent-specific transmission ratio distortion.

Authors:  Lam Opal Huang; Claire Infante-Rivard; Aurélie Labbe
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Parental effect of DNA (Cytosine-5) methyltransferase 1 on grandparental-origin-dependent transmission ratio distortion in mouse crosses and human families.

Authors:  Lanjian Yang; Moises Freitas Andrade; Stephane Labialle; Sanny Moussette; Geneviève Geneau; Donna Sinnett; Alexandre Belisle; Celia M T Greenwood; Anna K Naumova
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci with allelic transmission ratio distortion in F1 chicken population.

Authors:  Peng Ren; Feilong Deng; Shiyi Chen; Jinshan Ran; Jingjing Li; Lingqian Yin; Yan Wang; Huadong Yin; Qing Zhu; Yiping Liu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.291

4.  Is there a Mendelian transmission ratio distortion of the c.429_452dup(24bp) polyalanine tract ARX mutation?

Authors:  Cheryl Shoubridge; Alison Gardner; Charles E Schwartz; Anna Hackett; Michael Field; Jozef Gecz
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Transmission ratio distortion: review of concept and implications for genetic association studies.

Authors:  Lam Opal Huang; Aurélie Labbe; Claire Infante-Rivard
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Hierarchical fine mapping of the cystic fibrosis modifier locus on 19q13 identifies an association with two elements near the genes CEACAM3 and CEACAM6.

Authors:  Frauke Stanke; Tim Becker; Silke Hedtfeld; Stephanie Tamm; Thomas F Wienker; Burkhard Tümmler
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2010-01-03       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Asymmetry of parental origin in long QT syndrome: preferential maternal transmission of KCNQ1 variants linked to channel dysfunction.

Authors:  Hideki Itoh; Myriam Berthet; Véronique Fressart; Isabelle Denjoy; Svetlana Maugenre; Didier Klug; Yuka Mizusawa; Takeru Makiyama; Nynke Hofman; Birgit Stallmeyer; Sven Zumhagen; Wataru Shimizu; Arthur A M Wilde; Eric Schulze-Bahr; Minoru Horie; Sophie Tezenas du Montcel; Pascale Guicheney
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Assessment of transmission distortion on chromosome 6p in healthy individuals using tagSNPs.

Authors:  Pablo Sandro Carvalho Santos; Johannes Höhne; Peter Schlattmann; Inke R König; Andreas Ziegler; Barbara Uchanska-Ziegler; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Analysis of Case-Parent Trios Using a Loglinear Model with Adjustment for Transmission Ratio Distortion.

Authors:  Lam O Huang; Claire Infante-Rivard; Aurélie Labbe
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Genome-wide detection of tandem DNA repeats that are expanded in autism.

Authors:  Brett Trost; Worrawat Engchuan; Charlotte M Nguyen; Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram; Egor Dolzhenko; Ian Backstrom; Mila Mirceta; Bahareh A Mojarad; Yue Yin; Alona Dov; Induja Chandrakumar; Tanya Prasolava; Natalie Shum; Omar Hamdan; Giovanna Pellecchia; Jennifer L Howe; Joseph Whitney; Eric W Klee; Saurabh Baheti; David G Amaral; Evdokia Anagnostou; Mayada Elsabbagh; Bridget A Fernandez; Ny Hoang; M E Suzanne Lewis; Xudong Liu; Calvin Sjaarda; Isabel M Smith; Peter Szatmari; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; David Glazer; Dean Hartley; A Keith Stewart; Michael A Eberle; Nozomu Sato; Christopher E Pearson; Stephen W Scherer; Ryan K C Yuen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 69.504

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.