Literature DB >> 16391316

Preferences for mechanical ventilation among survivors of prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy.

Kathleen Guentner1, Leslie A Hoffman, Mary Beth Happ, Yookyung Kim, Annette Devito Dabbs, Aaron B Mendelsohn, Lakshmipathi Chelluri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among survivors of prolonged mechanical ventilation, preferences for this treatment have rarely been explored.
OBJECTIVES: To elicit preferences of survivors of prolonged mechanical ventilation (>or=7 days) and factors influencing these preferences.
METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey design was used. Subjects were recruited from intensive care units in a tertiary care hospital and from long-term care facilities. Each subject (n = 30) was asked to reflect on the decision to use mechanical ventilation; rate current health, pain/discomfort in the intensive care unit and from mechanical ventilation, perceived family financial burden, and emotional/physical stress related to mechanical ventilation; identify changes that would influence preference for mechanical ventilation; and answer questions about quality of life, functional status, depressive symptoms, and communication.
RESULTS: Most subjects (75.9%) would have chosen mechanical ventilation. Median days of mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy were greater for subjects who would have chosen mechanical ventilation (98.5 vs 70), as were median days of tracheostomy (102 vs 64). Patients who would not have chosen mechanical ventilation had more depressive symptoms and were more likely to be insured by Medicare. No other variables differed between groups. Patients who preferred mechanical ventilation would change their preference on the basis of their families' emotional/physical stress and financial burden. Patients who did not prefer mechanical ventilation would change their preference if the family financial burden and emotional/physical stress were reduced and current health improved.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients would have chosen mechanical ventilation. Survivors' preferences were influenced by their current health and families' financial burden and stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16391316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  9 in total

1.  Clinician-Family Communication About Patients' Values and Preferences in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Leslie P Scheunemann; Natalie C Ernecoff; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Shannon S Carson; Catherine L Hough; J Randall Curtis; Wendy G Anderson; Jay Steingrub; Bernard Lo; Michael Matthay; Robert M Arnold; Douglas B White
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Communication about chronic critical illness.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Alice F Mercado; Sharon L Camhi; Nidhi Tandon; Sylvan Wallenstein; Gary I August; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-10

3.  Alive and Ventilator Free: A Hierarchical, Composite Outcome for Clinical Trials in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Victor Novack; Jeremy R Beitler; Maayan Yitshak-Sade; B Taylor Thompson; David A Schoenfeld; Gordon Rubenfeld; Daniel Talmor; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  When doctors and daughters disagree: twenty-two days and two blinks of an eye.

Authors:  Peter M Abadir; Thomas E Finucane; Matthew K McNabney
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Depressive symptoms and anxiety in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors after ICU discharge.

Authors:  JiYeon Choi; Judith A Tate; Mary Alana Rogers; Michael P Donahoe; Leslie A Hoffman
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.210

6.  Assessment of preferences for treatment: validation of a measure.

Authors:  Souraya Sidani; Dana R Epstein; Richard R Bootzin; Patricia Moritz; Joyal Miranda
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 7.  Cost and health care utilization in ARDS--different from other critical illness?

Authors:  Thomas Bice; Christopher E Cox; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 8.  Depression in general intensive care unit survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dimitry S Davydow; Jeneen M Gifford; Sanjay V Desai; O Joseph Bienvenu; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Quality of life in patients aged 80 or over after ICU discharge.

Authors:  Alexis Tabah; Francois Philippart; Jean Francois Timsit; Vincent Willems; Adrien Français; Alain Leplège; Jean Carlet; Cédric Bruel; Benoit Misset; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.