Literature DB >> 16391125

Transcriptomic and proteomic approach for understanding the molecular basis of adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to wine fermentation.

Aurora Zuzuarregui1, Lucía Monteoliva, Concha Gil, Marcel lí del Olmo.   

Abstract

Throughout alcoholic fermentation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells have to cope with several stress conditions that could affect their growth and viability. In addition, the metabolic activity of yeast cells during this process leads to the production of secondary compounds that contribute to the organoleptic properties of the resulting wine. Commercial strains have been selected during the last decades for inoculation into the must to carry out the alcoholic fermentation on the basis of physiological traits, but little is known about the molecular basis of the fermentative behavior of these strains. In this work, we present the first transcriptomic and proteomic comparison between two commercial strains with different fermentative behaviors. Our results indicate that some physiological differences between the fermentative behaviors of these two strains could be related to differences in the mRNA and protein profiles. In this sense, at the level of gene expression, we have found differences related to carbohydrate metabolism, nitrogen catabolite repression, and response to stimuli, among other factors. In addition, we have detected a relative increase in the abundance of proteins involved in stress responses (the heat shock protein Hsp26p, for instance) and in fermentation (in particular, the major cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenase Ald6p) in the strain with better behavior during vinification. Moreover, in the case of the other strain, higher levels of enzymes required for sulfur metabolism (Cys4p, Hom6p, and Met22p) are observed, which could be related to the production of particular organoleptic compounds or to detoxification processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16391125      PMCID: PMC1352203          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.836-847.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  48 in total

1.  Identification and specificities of N-terminal acetyltransferases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B Polevoda; J Norbeck; H Takakura; A Blomberg; F Sherman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Expression levels and patterns of glycolytic yeast genes during wine fermentation.

Authors:  S Puig; J E Pérez-Ortín
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Stress response and expression patterns in wine fermentations of yeast genes induced at the diauxic shift.

Authors:  S Puig; J E Pérez-Ortín
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2000-01-30       Impact factor: 3.239

4.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes.

Authors:  A P Gasch; P T Spellman; C M Kao; O Carmel-Harel; M B Eisen; G Storz; D Botstein; P O Brown
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Quantitative analysis of wine yeast gene expression profiles under winemaking conditions.

Authors:  Cristian Varela; Javier Cárdenas; Francisco Melo; Eduardo Agosin
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 6.  Stress-controlled transcription factors, stress-induced genes and stress tolerance in budding yeast.

Authors:  F Estruch
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 7.  Fungal ABC proteins: pleiotropic drug resistance, stress response and cellular detoxification.

Authors:  H Wolfger; Y M Mamnun; K Kuchler
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2001 Apr-May       Impact factor: 3.992

8.  Cadmium-inducible expression of the yeast GSH1 gene requires a functional sulfur-amino acid regulatory network.

Authors:  U H Dormer; J Westwater; N F McLaren; N A Kent; J Mellor; D J Jamieson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Widespread collaboration of Isw2 and Sin3-Rpd3 chromatin remodeling complexes in transcriptional repression.

Authors:  T G Fazzio; C Kooperberg; J P Goldmark; C Neal; R Basom; J Delrow; T Tsukiyama
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  A proteome analysis of the cadmium response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K Vido; D Spector; G Lagniel; S Lopez; M B Toledano; J Labarre
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  18 in total

1.  Identification of genes related to nitrogen uptake in wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Contreras; V García; F Salinas; U Urzúa; M A Ganga; C Martínez
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Adjustment of trehalose metabolism in wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to modify ethanol yields.

Authors:  D Rossouw; E H Heyns; M E Setati; S Bosch; F F Bauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to different nitrogen concentrations during alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  A Mendes-Ferreira; M del Olmo; J García-Martínez; E Jiménez-Martí; A Mendes-Faia; J E Pérez-Ortín; C Leão
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Accumulation of non-superoxide anion reactive oxygen species mediates nitrogen-limited alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ana Mendes-Ferreira; Belém Sampaio-Marques; Catarina Barbosa; Fernando Rodrigues; Vítor Costa; Arlete Mendes-Faia; Paula Ludovico; Cecília Leão
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  A multi-level study of recombinant Pichia pastoris in different oxygen conditions.

Authors:  Kristin Baumann; Marc Carnicer; Martin Dragosits; Alexandra B Graf; Johannes Stadlmann; Paula Jouhten; Hannu Maaheimo; Brigitte Gasser; Joan Albiol; Diethard Mattanovich; Pau Ferrer
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-10-22

6.  Dynamics of the yeast transcriptome during wine fermentation reveals a novel fermentation stress response.

Authors:  Virginia D Marks; Shannan J Ho Sui; Daniel Erasmus; George K van der Merwe; Jochen Brumm; Wyeth W Wasserman; Jennifer Bryan; Hennie J J van Vuuren
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae signature genes for predicting nitrogen deficiency during alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  A Mendes-Ferreira; M del Olmo; J García-Martínez; E Jiménez-Martí; C Leão; A Mendes-Faia; J E Pérez-Ortín
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Quantitative transcription dynamic analysis reveals candidate genes and key regulators for ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Menggen Ma; Lewis Z Liu
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Deciphering the molecular basis of wine yeast fermentation traits using a combined genetic and genomic approach.

Authors:  Chloé Ambroset; Maud Petit; Christian Brion; Isabelle Sanchez; Pierre Delobel; Cyprien Guérin; Hélène Chiapello; Pierre Nicolas; Frédéric Bigey; Sylvie Dequin; Bruno Blondin
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  The genetic basis of natural variation in oenological traits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Francisco Salinas; Francisco A Cubillos; Daniela Soto; Verónica Garcia; Anders Bergström; Jonas Warringer; M Angélica Ganga; Edward J Louis; Gianni Liti; Claudio Martinez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.