Literature DB >> 16389980

Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.

Masahiko Uemura1, Masao Miyagawa, Yoshifumi Yasuhara, Tadashi Murakami, Hirohiko Ikura, Kana Sakamoto, Hiroyuki Tagashira, Kenji Arakawa, Teruhito Mochizuki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of dual-exposure dual-energy (DE) subtraction chest radiography with flat-panel detector.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients underwent dual-exposure DE subtraction chest radiography and chest CT for evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Fifty-two patients with pulmonary nodules and 48 patients with normal lungs were selected for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Ten radiologists who were unaware of the CT results evaluated chest radiography alone and chest radiography with DE subtraction images in the detection of pulmonary nodules. For each radiologist, we calculated the areas under the ROC curve (Az) for chest radiography alone and chest radiography with DE subtraction images.
RESULTS: The average detectability of dual-exposure DE subtraction chest radiography was statistically significantly higher than that of chest radiography without subtraction images (mean Az value increased from 0.784 to 0.815, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Dual-exposure DE subtraction chest radiography improves diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary nodules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16389980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Med        ISSN: 0288-2043


  13 in total

1.  Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study.

Authors:  Seitaro Oda; Kazuo Awai; Yoshinori Funama; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Yumi Yanaga; Koichi Kawanaka; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: detection of pulmonary nodules and masses in clinical practice.

Authors:  Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Michael A Patak; Seyran Yuksel-Hatz; Thomas Ruder; Peter Vock
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Optimization of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography by use of a direct-conversion flat-panel detector system.

Authors:  Mari Fukao; Kiyosumi Kawamoto; Hiroaki Matsuzawa; Osamu Honda; Takeshi Iwaki; Tsukasa Doi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-08-15

4.  Comparison of dual energy subtraction chest radiography and traditional chest X-rays in the detection of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Farheen Manji; Jiheng Wang; Geoff Norman; Zhou Wang; David Koff
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-02

5.  Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Digital Tomosynthesis, Dual-Energy Radiography, and Conventional Chest Radiography for the Detection and Management of Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; H Page McAdams; John M Sabol; Dev P Chakraborty; Ella A Kazerooni; Gautham P Reddy; Jenny Vikgren; Magnus Båth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Recent technological and application developments in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for improved pulmonary nodule detection and lung cancer staging.

Authors:  Jessica C Sieren; Yoshiharu Ohno; Hisanobu Koyama; Kazuro Sugimura; Geoffrey McLennan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Development of a high-performance dual-energy chest imaging system: initial investigation of diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Hany Kashani; Jianan Grace Gang; Nicholas A Shkumat; Carlos A Varon; John Yorkston; Richard Van Metter; Narinder S Paul; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference.

Authors:  Katharina Martini; Marco Baessler; Stephan Baumueller; Thomas Frauenfelder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality.

Authors:  Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Ulrich Neitzel; Henk W Venema; Martin Uffmann; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Subtraction MR Venography Acquired from Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography: Comparison with Phase-Contrast MR Venography and Single-Phase Contrast-Enhanced MR Venography.

Authors:  Jinhee Jang; Bum-Soo Kim; Jinkyeong Sung; Bom-Yi Kim; Hyun Seok Choi; So-Lyung Jung; Kook-Jin Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.