Literature DB >> 20437132

Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study.

Seitaro Oda1, Kazuo Awai, Yoshinori Funama, Daisuke Utsunomiya, Yumi Yanaga, Koichi Kawanaka, Yasuyuki Yamashita.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the detectability of simulated pulmonary nodules with different X-ray attenuation by flat-panel detector (FPD) chest radiography using a dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction (DES) technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a FPD radiography system, we obtained 108 sets of chest radiographs of a chest phantom. They consisted of 54 sets each of chest radiographs with and without simulated nodules. Each data set contained a standard and a corresponding dual-energy subtracted chest radiograph (DES image). The diameters of the simulated nodules were 8, 10, and 12 mm, respectively; nodules of each size manifested attenuation of -450, -200, and 30 Hounsfield units (HU). We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to compare the observers' performance in detecting nodules.
RESULTS: For the -450 HU nodules the mean areas under the ROC curve (AUC) without and with DES images were 0.66 and 0.77, respectively; the difference was significant (paired t-test, P < 0.01). For nodules with -200 and 30 HU, there was no significant difference in the AUC value (0.79 vs. 0.77, P = 0.13; 0.92 vs. 0.94, P = 0.17, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The addition of DES images to standard chest radiographs improved the performance of radiologists charged with detecting simulated nodules with an attenuation of -450 HU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20437132     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-009-0411-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  19 in total

1.  Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  J Shiraishi; S Katsuragawa; J Ikezoe; T Matsumoto; T Kobayashi; K Komatsu; M Matsui; H Fujita; Y Kodera; K Doi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Pitfalls in the radiologic diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  J H Woodring
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm.

Authors:  S Kido; J Ikezoe; H Naito; J Arisawa; S Tamura; T Kozuka; W Ito; K Shimura; H Kato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  F Kelcz; F E Zink; W W Peppler; D G Kruger; D L Ergun; C A Mistretta
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Detectability of lung nodules using flat panel detector with dual energy subtraction by two shot method: evaluation by ROC method.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tagashira; Kenji Arakawa; Masahiro Yoshimoto; Teruhito Mochizuki; Kenya Murase
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography.

Authors:  M Kaneko; K Eguchi; H Ohmatsu; R Kakinuma; T Naruke; K Suemasu; N Moriyama
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.

Authors:  Klaus Bacher; Peter Smeets; Kris Bonnarens; An De Hauwere; Koenraad Verstraete; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography for lung nodule detection: results of an international multicenter trial.

Authors:  Ricarda Rühl; Magdalena M Wozniak; Michael Werk; François Laurent; Georg Mager; Michel Montaudon; Andreas Pattermann; Antoine Scherrer; Jean-Pierre Tasu; Maciej Pech; Jens Ricke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Ground-glass opacities on thin-section helical CT: differentiation between bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia.

Authors:  Seitaro Oda; Kazuo Awai; Duo Liu; Takeshi Nakaura; Yumi Yanaga; Hiroaki Nomori; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Detection of lung cancer using single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.

Authors:  Kana Ide; Hiroshi Mogami; Tadashi Murakami; Yoshifumi Yasuhara; Masao Miyagawa; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-06-27
View more
  2 in total

1.  A comparison of computer-aided detection (CAD) effectiveness in pulmonary nodule identification using different methods of bone suppression in chest radiographs.

Authors:  Ronald D Novak; Nicholas J Novak; Robert Gilkeson; Bahar Mansoori; Gunhild E Aandal
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Lung cancer screening by single-shot dual-energy subtraction using flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Hiroshi Mogami; Yumiko Onoike; Hiroshi Miyano; Kenji Arakawa; Hiromi Inoue; Kouji Sakae; Toshiaki Kawakami
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.374

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.