Literature DB >> 16387209

A clinical prediction rule for early discharge of patients with chest pain.

Jim Christenson1, Grant Innes, Douglas McKnight, Christopher R Thompson, Hubert Wong, Eugenia Yu, Barb Boychuk, Eric Grafstein, Frances Rosenberg, Kenneth Gin, Aslam Anis, Joel Singer.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Current risk stratification tools do not identify very-low-risk patients who can be safely discharged without prolonged emergency department (ED) observation, expensive rule-out protocols, or provocative testing. We seek to develop a clinical prediction rule applicable within 2 hours of ED arrival that would miss fewer than 2% of acute coronary syndrome patients and allow discharge within 2 to 3 hours for at least 30% of patients without acute coronary syndrome.
METHODS: This prospective, cohort study enrolled consenting eligible subjects at least 25 years old at a single site. At 30 days, investigators assigned a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome or no acute coronary syndrome according to predefined explicit definitions. A recursive partitioning model included risk factors, pain characteristics, physical and ECG findings, and cardiac marker results.
RESULTS: Of 769 patients studied, 77 (10.0%) had acute myocardial infarction and 88 (11.4%) definite unstable angina. We derived a clinical prediction rule that was 98.8% sensitive and 32.5% specific. Patients have very low risk of acute coronary syndrome if they have a normal initial ECG, no previous ischemic chest pain, and age younger than 40 years. In addition, patients at least 40 years old and with a normal ECG result, no previous ischemic chest pain, and low-risk pain characteristics have very low risk if they have an initial creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) less than 3.0 microg/L or an initial CK-MB greater than or equal to 3.0 microg/L but no ECG or serum-marker increase at 2 hours.
CONCLUSION: The Vancouver Chest Pain Rule for early discharge defines a group of patients who can be safely discharged after a brief evaluation in the ED. Prospective validation is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16387209     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  24 in total

1.  Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: tools to improve the value of emergency care.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Schuur; Christopher W Baugh; Erik P Hess; Joshua A Hilton; Jesse M Pines; Brent R Asplin
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Efficacy of High-Sensitivity Troponin T in Identifying Very-Low-Risk Patients With Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  W Frank Peacock; Brigette M Baumann; Deborah Bruton; Thomas E Davis; Beverly Handy; Christopher W Jones; Judd E Hollander; Alexander T Limkakeng; Abhi Mehrotra; Martin Than; Andre Ziegler; Carina Dinkel
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Impact of clinical predictors and routine coronary artery disease testing on outcome of patients admitted to chest pain decision unit.

Authors:  Vlad Cotarlan; David Ho; John Pineda; Anwer Qureshi; Jamshid Shirani
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Acute nontraumatic chest pain in emergency department and cost-effectiveness evaluation.

Authors:  Zeynep Cakir; Ayhan Saritas; Sahin Aslan; Mucahit Emet; Hayati Kandis
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2008-12

5.  Consumption of diagnostic procedures and other cardiology care in chest pain patients after presentation at the emergency department.

Authors:  A J Six; B E Backus; A Kingma; S I Kaandorp
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 6.  Signs and symptoms in diagnosing acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rudi Bruyninckx; Bert Aertgeerts; Pieter Bruyninckx; Frank Buntinx
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  The challenge of triaging chest pain patients: the bernese university hospital experience.

Authors:  Martin Rohacek; Amina Bertolotti; Nadine Grützmüller; Urs Simmen; Hans Marty; Heinz Zimmermann; Aristomenis Exadaktylos; Arampatzis Spyridon
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 1.112

8.  Ruling out coronary heart disease in primary care patients with chest pain: a clinical prediction score.

Authors:  Baris Gencer; Paul Vaucher; Lilli Herzig; François Verdon; Christiane Ruffieux; Stefan Bösner; Bernard Burnand; Thomas Bischoff; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Bernard Favrat
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  A clinical scoring system in undifferentiated chest pain predicting undetectable troponin concentration.

Authors:  Colin Gordon Stirrat; Allan David Cameron; Nicholas Linton Mills; Francis Gerard Dunn
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dis Res       Date:  2013-06-21

10.  A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; George A Wells; Allan Jaffe; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.