Literature DB >> 1638705

Efficacy of automatic multimodal device therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias as delivered by a new implantable pacing cardioverter-defibrillator. Results of a European multicenter study of 102 implants.

M Fromer1, J Brachmann, M Block, J Siebels, E Hoffmann, J Almendral, O J Ohm, K den Dulk, P Coumel, A J Camm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are devices designed to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) by means of overdrive pacing, cardioversion, or defibrillation. So far, the efficacy of tiered therapy has been documented only in small series. Therefore, a European multicenter clinical evaluation study of a new tachyarrhythmia control device, the Medtronic PCD pacer-cardioverter-defibrillator with epicardial patch-lead configuration, was undertaken. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We report on 102 patients (mean age, 55 +/- 13 years) from 11 European centers. PCD devices implanted between May 1989 and February 1991 were included. The patients suffered from hemodynamically significant ventricular tachyarrhythmias not suppressed by antiarrhythmic drug therapy and unrelated to acute myocardial infarction; one patient had nonsustained VT and severely depressed left ventricular function. Seventy patients had coronary artery disease with old myocardial infarctions, 23 had cardiomyopathies of various etiologies, and nine patients had no detectable heart disease. Mean ejection fraction was 36 +/- 14% (range, 10-76%). Mean intraoperative defibrillation threshold (51 patients) was 10.6 +/- 5.1 J (range, 2-18 J). The documented follow-up ranged from 1 to 21 months (mean, 9.4 +/- 5.8 months), or 79.9 cumulative patient-years. Perioperative mortality was 3.9%. The actuarial survival rate at 12 months was 91%. One sudden arrhythmic death occurred. Sixty patients (58%) received device therapy. Seventeen patients had therapies only for "VF" episodes, 16 patients only for VT, and 28 patients for VT and "VF" episodes. Based on device memory data, 1,235 spontaneous VT episodes were detected and treated in 43 patients. Twelve hundred four of these VT episodes received painless initial antitachycardia pacing therapy, restoring sinus rhythm in 91%. The 108 ongoing episodes received 209 multiple therapeutic attempts. Eighty-five additional overdrive pacing therapies restored sinus rhythm in 30%. Initial ineffective antitachycardia pacing therapies received 51 cardioversion pulses. The success rate was 61%. Seventy-three additional cardioversion pulses were delivered to backup ineffective pacing therapy as well as ineffective secondary cardioversion pulses. Their success rate was only 40%. Two hundred eighty-six spontaneous episodes were detected in 44 patients as "VF." Overall defibrillation efficacy was 97.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: The implanted device nearly eliminates sudden arrhythmic death in patients with documented, potentially fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Automatic tiered therapy is highly effective to restore sinus rhythm, provided that an integrated two-zone tachycardia detection algorithm is used, assigning lower tachycardia rates to overdrive pacing and/or cardioversion and higher tachycardia rates to defibrillation. In general, spontaneous VTs can be terminated by automatic overdrive pacing, and painful or disturbing countershock therapies are not required to terminate the majority of spontaneous VT episodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1638705     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.86.2.363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current state of knowledge and experts' perspective on the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  Massimo Santini; Riccardo Cappato; Dietrich Andresen; Johannes Brachmann; D Wyn Davies; John Cleland; Alessandro Filippi; Edoardo Gronda; Richard Hauer; Gerhard Steinbeck; David Steinhaus
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  High-energy defibrillation increases the dispersion of regional ventricular repolarization.

Authors:  Yang Pang; Qi Jin; Ning Zhang; Shujing Ren; Tianyou Ling; Ying Chen; Gang Gu; Yongchu Shen; Liqun Wu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs with implantable defibrillator therapy for atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Authors:  R B Krol; S Saksena; A Prakash
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Clinical experience with the transvenous Medtronic Pacer Cardioverter Defibrillator (PCD) System.

Authors:  A Golino; C Pappone; A Panza; M Santomauro; D Iorio; V De Amicis; M Chiariello; N Spampinato
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1993

5.  Benefits of treatment with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with stable ventricular tachycardia without cardiac arrest.

Authors:  D Böcker; M Block; F Isbruch; C Fastenrath; M Castrucci; D Hammel; H H Scheld; M Borggrefe; G Breithardt
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-02

6.  Arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator - results from the Prospective Study on Predictive Quality with Preferencing PainFree ATP therapies (4P).

Authors:  François Regoli; Denis Graf; Beat Schaer; Firat Duru; Peter Ammann; Lorenza Mangoni di S Stefano; Barbara Naegli; Haran Burri; Rainer Zbinden; Nazmi Krasniqi; Martin Fromer
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.298

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.