Literature DB >> 16384995

Reliability and consistency of dark-adapted psychophysical measures in advanced eye disease.

Ava K Kiser1, Derek Mladenovich, Fariba Eshraghi, Debra Bourdeau, Gislin Dagnelie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish reliable vision measures allowing functional monitoring in patients with severe vision loss.
METHODS: Legally blind and normally sighted subjects were enrolled in a repeated-measures study to determine the reproducibility of psychophysical vision measures under scotopic conditions. The tests included dark adaptometry, dark-adapted, full-field flash testing, and dark-adapted macular thresholds, obtained by using a perimeter with 500- and 650-nm targets. Two to five test repetitions were performed on the better eye of each subject at monthly intervals. Subject groups included retinitis pigmentosa (RP; n = 33), macular disease (MD; n = 14), optic nerve disease (ON; n = 4), diabetic retinopathy (DR; n = 5), and other retinal diseases (OR; n = 9), and normally sighted control (CTL; n = 12).
RESULTS: Dark adaptometry timing yielded mean coefficients of variation for subjects across all groups that averaged approximately 20% throughout the test. For dark-adapted perimetry, the coefficients of repeatability (CR(.95)) were <7 dB (CTL), <8 dB (OR), <6 dB (ON and RP), and <15 dB (MD). Full-field flash test CR(.95) by group varied from 5 to 15 dB, and most low-vision groups performed more reliably than CTL subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Dark-adapted psychophysical tests can provide reproducible vision measures in subjects with severe visual impairments, and these tests would be useful in monitoring outcomes in future clinical trials to reverse, halt, or slow vision loss. The most valuable measure of remaining vision was the dark-adapted, full-field flash test, as it produced repeatable results at all levels of vision loss and for all disease states included in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16384995     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  9 in total

1.  Fundus-controlled two-color dark adaptometry with the Microperimeter MP1.

Authors:  Wadim Bowl; Knut Stieger; Birgit Lorenz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Learning effect of dark adaptation among normal subjects.

Authors:  John Christoforidis; Xiaoli Zhang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  A pilot study of an acupuncture protocol to improve visual function in retinitis pigmentosa patients.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Jeffrey M Gould; Andy Rosenfarb; Collin Rozanski; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 4.  Validation of structural and functional lesions of diabetic retinopathy in mice.

Authors:  T S Kern; J Tang; B A Berkowitz
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.367

5.  Regional Variations and Intra-/Intersession Repeatability for Scotopic Sensitivity in Normal Controls and Patients With Inherited Retinal Degenerations.

Authors:  Lea D Bennett; Georgiana Metz; Martin Klein; Kirsten G Locke; Areeba Khwaja; David G Birch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Visual Cortical Plasticity in Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; Lucia Galli-Resta; Paola Binda; Guido Marco Cicchini; Giorgio Placidi; Benedetto Falsini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  A novel device for assessing dark adaptation in field settings.

Authors:  Alain B Labrique; Amanda C Palmer; Katherine Healy; Sucheta Mehra; Theodor C Sauer; Keith P West; Alfred Sommer
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Improvements in Test-Retest Variability of Static Automated Perimetry by Censoring Results With Low Sensitivity in Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Anushka Mistry; Leon Nehmad; Rakin Khan; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Validation of a Vision-Guided Mobility Assessment for RPE65-Associated Retinal Dystrophy.

Authors:  Neruban Kumaran; Robin R Ali; Nick A Tyler; James W B Bainbridge; Michel Michaelides; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.283

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.