Literature DB >> 16381806

Effects of end-goal on hand shaping.

Caterina Ansuini1, Marco Santello, Stefano Massaccesi, Umberto Castiello.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine whether hand shaping was affected by planning of an action subsequent to object contact. Ten subjects (5 females and 5 males, ages 19-33) were requested to reach toward and grasp a convex object between the thumb and the four fingers of the right hand and to perform one of the following actions: 1) lift up the object; 2) insert the object into a niche of a similar shape and size as the object, or 3) insert the object into a rectangular niche much larger than the object. Flexion/extension at the metacarpal-phalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints of all digits were measured using resistive sensors embedded in a glove. Although all experimental conditions required grasping the same object, we found different covariation patterns among finger joint angles across conditions. Gradual preshaping of the hand occurred only when planning object lift or when the end-goal required object placement into the tight niche. In contrast, for the larger niche, gradual preshaping was not evident for the ring and the little finger. Further, reaching movements were faster for movements ending with the larger niche than for the other movement conditions. The present results suggest that hand shaping takes into account end-goal in addition to object geometry. We discuss these findings in the context of forward internal models that allow the prediction of the sensorimotor consequences of motor commands in advance to their execution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16381806     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01107.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  64 in total

1.  Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture.

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan; Marco Santello; Andrew M Gordon; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Oral hapsis guides accurate hand preshaping for grasping food targets in the mouth.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Attention and reach-to-grasp movements in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Cathy Lu; Aamir Bharmal; Zelma H Kiss; Oksana Suchowersky; Angela M Haffenden
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neural correlates of pantomiming familiar and unfamiliar tools: action semantics versus mechanical problem solving?

Authors:  Guy Vingerhoets; Elisabeth Vandekerckhove; Pieterjan Honoré; Pieter Vandemaele; Eric Achten
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Observing functional actions affects semantic processing of tools: evidence of a motor-to-semantic priming.

Authors:  Francesco De Bellis; Antonia Ferrara; Domenico Errico; Francesco Panico; Laura Sagliano; Massimiliano Conson; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Livia Giosa; Luca Turella; Gianmarco Altoè; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Neurophysiology of prehension. III. Representation of object features in posterior parietal cortex of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Esther P Gardner; K Srinivasa Babu; Soumya Ghosh; Adam Sherwood; Jessie Chen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Palmar arch dynamics during reach-to-grasp tasks.

Authors:  Archana P Sangole; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Tailoring reach-to-grasp to intended action: the role of motor practice.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.