Literature DB >> 16381677

Radiation protection standards: their evolution from science to philosophy.

R L Dixon1, Joel E Gray, B R Archer, D J Simpkin.   

Abstract

The concept of applying constraints on individual sources to a small fraction of the public dose limit has been deemed inappropriate when shielding the medical X-ray sources. This represents a broad-based consensus of medical physics and radiological societies in the United States, and the report series on the shielding design for medical X-ray sources (including dental, X-ray imaging and therapeutic X ray) from the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) utilises 1 mSv y(-1) as a source control limit. In the present study, the rationale for such a conclusion is discussed, and a somewhat critical look at the current model of radiation protection of the public is made.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16381677     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  2 in total

1.  Very low utility of surveillance imaging in early-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma treated with a combination of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine and radiation therapy.

Authors:  Neetha Gandikota; Sidonie Hartridge-Lambert; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Joachim Yahalom; Carol S Portlock; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  RadShield: semiautomated shielding design using a floor plan driven graphical user interface.

Authors:  Matthew C DeLorenzo; Dee H Wu; Kai Yang; Isaac B Rutel
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.