Literature DB >> 16381662

A combined approach to drug metabolism and toxicity assessment.

Sean Ekins1, Sergey Andreyev, Andy Ryabov, Eugene Kirillov, Eugene A Rakhmatulin, Svetlana Sorokina, Andrej Bugrim, Tatiana Nikolskaya.   

Abstract

The challenge of predicting the metabolism or toxicity of a drug in humans has been approached using in vivo animal models, in vitro systems, high throughput genomics and proteomics methods, and, more recently, computational approaches. Understanding the complexity of biological systems requires a broader perspective rather than focusing on just one method in isolation for prediction. Multiple methods may therefore be necessary and combined for a more accurate prediction. In the field of drug metabolism and toxicology, we have seen the growth, in recent years, of computational quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), as well as empirical data from microarrays. In the current study we have further developed a novel computational approach, MetaDrug, that 1) predicts metabolites for molecules based on their chemical structure, 2) predicts the activity of the original compound and its metabolites with various absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity models, 3) incorporates the predictions with human cell signaling and metabolic pathways and networks, and 4) integrates networks and metabolites, with relevant toxicogenomic or other high throughput data. We have demonstrated the utility of such an approach using recently published data from in vitro metabolism and microarray studies for aprepitant, 2(S)-((3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-oxy)-3(S)phenyl-4-((3-oxo-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)methyl)morpholine (L-742694), trovofloxacin, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, and artemisinin and other artemisinin analogs to show the predicted interactions with cytochromes P450, pregnane X receptor, and P-glycoprotein, and the metabolites and the networks of genes that are affected. As a comparison, we used a second computational approach, MetaCore, to generate statistically significant gene networks with the available expression data. These case studies demonstrate the combination of QSARs and systems biology methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16381662     DOI: 10.1124/dmd.105.008458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  21 in total

1.  Pharmacophore modeling, molecular docking, QSAR, and in silico ADMET studies of gallic acid derivatives for immunomodulatory activity.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar Yadav; Feroz Khan; Arvind Singh Negi
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Comparison of low and high dose ionising radiation using topological analysis of gene coexpression networks.

Authors:  Monika Ray; Reem Yunis; Xiucui Chen; David M Rocke
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 3.  Predicting drug metabolism: experiment and/or computation?

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Andreas H Göller; Dieter Lang; Jens Kunze; Bernard Testa; Ian D Wilson; Robert C Glen; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Quantitative structure activity relationship for inhibition of human organic cation/carnitine transporter.

Authors:  Lei Diao; Sean Ekins; James E Polli
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Alterations of chemotherapeutic pharmacokinetic profiles by drug-drug interactions.

Authors:  Sridhar Mani; Mohammed Ghalib; Imran Chaudhary; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.481

6.  A gene expression signature of CD34+ cells to predict major cytogenetic response in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib.

Authors:  Shannon K McWeeney; Lucy C Pemberton; Marc M Loriaux; Kristina Vartanian; Stephanie G Willis; Gregory Yochum; Beth Wilmot; Yaron Turpaz; Raji Pillai; Brian J Druker; Jennifer L Snead; Mary MacPartlin; Stephen G O'Brien; Junia V Melo; Thoralf Lange; Christina A Harrington; Michael W N Deininger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Prediction and testing of biological networks underlying intestinal cancer.

Authors:  Vishal N Patel; Gurkan Bebek; John M Mariadason; Donghai Wang; Leonard H Augenlicht; Mark R Chance
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of computational docking to identify pregnane X receptor agonists in the ToxCast database.

Authors:  Sandhya Kortagere; Matthew D Krasowski; Erica J Reschly; Madhukumar Venkatesh; Sridhar Mani; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Machine learning methods and docking for predicting human pregnane X receptor activation.

Authors:  Akash Khandelwal; Matthew D Krasowski; Erica J Reschly; Michael W Sinz; Peter W Swaan; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Challenges predicting ligand-receptor interactions of promiscuous proteins: the nuclear receptor PXR.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Sandhya Kortagere; Manisha Iyer; Erica J Reschly; Markus A Lill; Matthew R Redinbo; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.