Literature DB >> 16380699

Shape characteristics of the foot arch: dynamics in the pregnancy period.

Karel Jelen1, Zuzana Tetkova, Lena Halounova, Karel Pavelka, Tomas Koudelka, Pavel Ruzicka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim is data detection and finding some load consequences generated by various mechanical or physiological changes in the interaction of the end segment of the body--the foot--and the environment.
DESIGN: Shape instability of the foot caused by e.g. loading of the foot by long-term frequency loads--walking, by extreme loads--sport, by hormonal changes--pregnancy, by aging, by pathologies, etc. The footprint surface was numerically described in 3D by means of stereo-photo-gram-metrical method--DMR digital relief model. Density of discrete points--250-400 per one print.
SETTING: Detailed DMR was constructed by means of triangular web including contour picture with the use of Atlas program. The specified generated web is characterized by triangles with a cca 1 mm side in the number of up to 4,500 elements per one footprint model.
RESULTS: The results enable us to deduce shape characteristics of DMR--the shape of the interactive boundary of the foot--the rest surface, to solve foot arch straining, to solve issues of discomfort and distribution of the pressure at the boundary of the foot--the rest surface, the shoe, etc. The gained findings can be interpreted in the field of prevention, therapy, orthopedics, podology, and enable us to come up with recommendations for the orthopedic practice and industrial use in the footwear production, etc. THE MAIN
FINDINGS: The difference between volume reductions of the space under the foot arch characterizes the level of "fall" of the arch. This criterion is independent of the foot size, and is in 3D.
CONCLUSIONS: Shape characteristics of footprints in pregnant women and in the period after childbirth were calculated on the basis of the defined criterion. The results of the group of four women tested in three periods suggest that there is no clear tendency towards the foot arch falling/increasing of the foot arch "fall" during the pregnancy period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16380699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Endocrinol Lett        ISSN: 0172-780X            Impact factor:   0.765


  8 in total

1.  [Changes in shape and size of the foot during pregnancy].

Authors:  H H Wetz; J Hentschel; B Drerup; L Kiesel; N Osada; U Veltmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Effect of pregnancy and obesity on arch of foot.

Authors:  John Dunn; Christina Dunn; Rohan Habbu; Donald Bohay; John Anderson
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.071

3.  Correlation between Foot Arch Index and the Intensity of Foot, Knee, and Lower Back Pain among Pregnant Women in a South-Eastern Nigerian Community.

Authors:  Chidiebele Petronilla Ojukwu; Emeka Godson Anyanwu; Ginika Gladys Nwafor
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Pregnancy leads to lasting changes in foot structure.

Authors:  Neil A Segal; Elizabeth R Boyer; Patricia Teran-Yengle; Natalie A Glass; Howard J Hillstrom; H John Yack
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Does the first trimester of pregnancy induce alterations in the walking pattern?

Authors:  Wanda Forczek; Agata Masłoń; Barbara Frączek; Marta Curyło; Marcin Salamaga; Agnieszka Suder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Three-dimensional measurement of foot arch in preschool children.

Authors:  Hsun-Wen Chang; Chien-Ju Lin; Li-Chieh Kuo; Ming-June Tsai; Hsiao-Feng Chieh; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Kinetic and Kinematic Differences in a Golf Swing in One and Both Lower Limb Amputees.

Authors:  Petr Stastny; Adam Maszczyk; Kristina Tománková; Petr Kubový; Michaela Richtrová; Jakub Otáhal; Rostislav Čichoň; Aleksandra Mostowik; Piotr Żmijewski; Paweł Cięszczyk
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 2.193

8.  Performance and Kinematic Differences in Putting between Healthy and Disabled Elite Golfers.

Authors:  Tomáš Gryc; Petr Stastny; František Zahálka; Wojciech Smółka; Piotr Żmijewski; Artur Gołaś; Marek Zawartka; Tomáš Malý
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.193

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.