OBJECTIVE: Women are disproportionately affected by musculoskeletal disorders. Parous women seem to be at a particularly elevated risk for structural and functional changes in the lower limbs. The combination of increased weight on the joints with potentially greater laxity during pregnancy could lead to permanent structural changes in the feet. Although arches may become lax during pregnancy, it is unknown whether the changes persist. The objective of this study was to determine whether arch height loss persists postpartum. DESIGN: Forty-nine women completed this longitudinal study. Static and dynamic arch measurements were collected in the first trimester and at 19 wks postpartum. Linear mixed models were used to determine whether outcome measures significantly changed overall or by parity. RESULTS: Arch height and rigidity indices significantly decreased, with concomitant increases in foot length and arch drop. The first pregnancy accounted for the reduction in arch rigidity and the increases in foot length and arch drop. No changes were detected in the center of pressure excursion index. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy seems to be associated with a permanent loss of arch height, and the first pregnancy may be the most significant. These changes in the feet could contribute to the increased risk for musculoskeletal disorders in women. Further research should assess the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions for prevention of pregnancy-related arch drop.
OBJECTIVE:Women are disproportionately affected by musculoskeletal disorders. Parous women seem to be at a particularly elevated risk for structural and functional changes in the lower limbs. The combination of increased weight on the joints with potentially greater laxity during pregnancy could lead to permanent structural changes in the feet. Although arches may become lax during pregnancy, it is unknown whether the changes persist. The objective of this study was to determine whether arch height loss persists postpartum. DESIGN: Forty-nine women completed this longitudinal study. Static and dynamic arch measurements were collected in the first trimester and at 19 wks postpartum. Linear mixed models were used to determine whether outcome measures significantly changed overall or by parity. RESULTS: Arch height and rigidity indices significantly decreased, with concomitant increases in foot length and arch drop. The first pregnancy accounted for the reduction in arch rigidity and the increases in foot length and arch drop. No changes were detected in the center of pressure excursion index. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy seems to be associated with a permanent loss of arch height, and the first pregnancy may be the most significant. These changes in the feet could contribute to the increased risk for musculoskeletal disorders in women. Further research should assess the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions for prevention of pregnancy-related arch drop.
Authors: Neil A Segal; David T Felson; James C Torner; Yanyan Zhu; Jeffrey R Curtis; Jingbo Niu; Michael C Nevitt Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Thales R Souza; Rafael Z Pinto; Renato G Trede; Renata N Kirkwood; Sérgio T Fonseca Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: K Douglas Gross; David T Felson; Jingbo Niu; David J Hunter; Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; Alyssa B Dufour; Rebekah H Gensure; Marian T Hannan Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Finn Tüchsen; Harald Hannerz; Hermann Burr; Thomas Lund; Niklas Krause Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Marc J Heronemus; Kaitlin Rabe; Irina Tolstykh; K Douglas Gross; Barton L Wise; Michael C Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; Howard J Hillstrom; Neil A Segal Journal: PM R Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Alyssa B Dufour; Virginia A Casey; Yvonne M Golightly; Marian T Hannan Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jinsup Song; Reagan Kane; Dana N Tango; Stephanie S Vander Veur; James Furmato; Eugene Komaroff; Gary D Foster Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Thomas J Hagedorn; Alyssa B Dufour; Yvonne M Golightly; Jody L Riskowski; Howard J Hillstrom; Virginia A Casey; Marian T Hannan Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Monserrat Alcahuz-Griñan; Pilar Nieto-Gil; Pedro Perez-Soriano; Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 3.390