Literature DB >> 1637986

Efficacy of repeated measures in regression models with measurement error.

X Liu1, K Y Liang.   

Abstract

Ignoring measurement error may cause bias in the estimation of regression parameters. When the true covariates are unobservable, multiple imprecise measurements can be used in the analysis to correct for the associated bias. We suggest a simple estimating procedure that gives consistent estimates of regression parameters by using the repeated measurements with error. The relative Pitman efficiency of our estimator based on models with and without measurement error has been found to be a simple function of the number of replicates and the ratio of intra- to inter-variance of the true covariate. The procedure thus provides a guide for deciding the number of repeated measurements in the design stage. An example from a survey study is presented.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1637986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  3 in total

1.  Estimation and testing based on data subject to measurement errors: from parametric to non-parametric likelihood methods.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Wan-Min Tsai; Yaakov Malinovsky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A nonlinear measurement error model and its application to describing the dependency of health outcomes on dietary intake.

Authors:  B Curley
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 1.416

Review 3.  The Measurement Error Elephant in the Room: Challenges and Solutions to Measurement Error in Epidemiology.

Authors:  Gabriel K Innes; Fiona Bhondoekhan; Bryan Lau; Alden L Gross; Derek K Ng; Alison G Abraham
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.280

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.