UNLABELLED: Nalmefene Stimulation of the HPA Axis. BACKGROUND: The Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis plays a vital role in the body's response to stress. The traditional gold standard for evaluating the HPA axis, the insulin hypoglycemia test (IHT), has several known limitations, and a second test, the standard ACTH stimulation test, can detect severe deficiencies of cortisol, but often misses mild or early cases. Therefore, a better test for the evaluation of the HPA axis is needed. This study evaluated the opiate antagonist nalmefene as a stimulation test of the HPA axis. METHODS: 25 healthy subjects were studied, 9 women and 16 men, mean age 30.4 yr. (range 21-55), and mean BMI 24.1 kg/m2 (range 18.6-34.2). Subjects received one of 3 doses of intravenously administered nalmefene: 2 mg (n = 6), 6 mg (n = 12), or 10 mg (n = 7). Serum cortisol and plasma ACTH were measured before and serially over two hours after the administration of nalmefene. RESULTS: ACTH and cortisol levels rose significantly and similarly after the 10 mg dose and the 6 mg dose. After the 10 mg dose, mean peak ACTH was 82.4 +/- 22.6 pg/ml and mean peak cortisol was 25.2 +/- 1.8 microg/dl. After the 6 mg dose, mean peak ACTH was 70.3 +/- 7.7 pg/ml and mean peak cortisol was 24.7 +/- 1.7 microg/dl. Cortisol levels rose above 18 microg/dl in all subjects receiving 10 mg of nalmefene, and in all but two of the subjects receiving 6 mg of nalmefene. Side effects to nalmefene were of greater duration and intensity in the subjects receiving 10 mg of nalmefene vs. those receiving 6 or 2 mg. These included most notably fatigue, lightheadedness, nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Of the nalmefene doses we studied, 6 mg achieved the best combination of stimulation of ACTH and cortisol and fewest side effects. If further studies show a concordance between nalmefene and IHT, nalmefene testing could be used to assess the HPA axis in patients at risk for dysfunction of this axis.
UNLABELLED: Nalmefene Stimulation of the HPA Axis. BACKGROUND: The Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis plays a vital role in the body's response to stress. The traditional gold standard for evaluating the HPA axis, the insulin hypoglycemia test (IHT), has several known limitations, and a second test, the standard ACTH stimulation test, can detect severe deficiencies of cortisol, but often misses mild or early cases. Therefore, a better test for the evaluation of the HPA axis is needed. This study evaluated the opiate antagonist nalmefene as a stimulation test of the HPA axis. METHODS: 25 healthy subjects were studied, 9 women and 16 men, mean age 30.4 yr. (range 21-55), and mean BMI 24.1 kg/m2 (range 18.6-34.2). Subjects received one of 3 doses of intravenously administered nalmefene: 2 mg (n = 6), 6 mg (n = 12), or 10 mg (n = 7). Serum cortisol and plasma ACTH were measured before and serially over two hours after the administration of nalmefene. RESULTS: ACTH and cortisol levels rose significantly and similarly after the 10 mg dose and the 6 mg dose. After the 10 mg dose, mean peak ACTH was 82.4 +/- 22.6 pg/ml and mean peak cortisol was 25.2 +/- 1.8 microg/dl. After the 6 mg dose, mean peak ACTH was 70.3 +/- 7.7 pg/ml and mean peak cortisol was 24.7 +/- 1.7 microg/dl. Cortisol levels rose above 18 microg/dl in all subjects receiving 10 mg of nalmefene, and in all but two of the subjects receiving 6 mg of nalmefene. Side effects to nalmefene were of greater duration and intensity in the subjects receiving 10 mg of nalmefene vs. those receiving 6 or 2 mg. These included most notably fatigue, lightheadedness, nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Of the nalmefene doses we studied, 6 mg achieved the best combination of stimulation of ACTH and cortisol and fewest side effects. If further studies show a concordance between nalmefene and IHT, nalmefene testing could be used to assess the HPA axis in patients at risk for dysfunction of this axis.
Authors: Abdulwahab M Suliman; Thomas P Smith; Mourad Labib; Tarek M Fiad; T Joseph McKenna Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: E J Nye; J E Grice; G I Hockings; C R Strakosch; G V Crosbie; M M Walters; D J Torpy; R V Jackson Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: B J Mason; E C Ritvo; R O Morgan; F R Salvato; G Goldberg; B Welch; E Mantero-Atienza Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Cassidy Vuong; Stan H M Van Uum; Laura E O'Dell; Kabirullah Lutfy; Theodore C Friedman Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Nathalie V Goletiani; Jack H Mendelson; Michelle B Sholar; Arthur J Siegel; Nancy K Mello Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 3.533