OBJECTIVES: Low doses of ACTH [1-24] (0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 microg per 1.73 m2) may provide a more physiological level of adrenal stimulation than the standard 250 microg test, but not all studies have concluded that the 1.0 microg is a more sensitive screening test for central hypoadrenalism. Eight-hour infusions of high dose ACTH [1-24] have also been suggested as a means of assessing the adrenals' capacity for sustained cortisol secretion. In this study, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of three low dose ACTH tests (LDTs) and the 8-h infusion with the standard 250 microg test (HDT) and the insulin hypoglycaemia test (IHT) in patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease. SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: Three groups of subjects were studied. A healthy control group (group 1, n = 9) and 33 patients with known hypothalamic or pituitary disease who were divided into group 2 (n = 12, underwent IHT) and group 3 (n = 21, IHT contraindicated). Six different tests were performed: a standard IHT (0.15 U/kg soluble insulin); a 60-minute 250 microg HDT; three different LDTs using 0.1 microg, 0.5 microg and 1.0 microg (all per 1.73 m2); and an 8-h infusion test (250 microg ACTH [1-24] at a constant rate over 8 h). RESULTS: Nine out of the 12 patients in group 2 failed the IHT. Three out of 12 patients from group 2 who clearly passed the IHT, also passed all the ACTH [1-24] stimulation tests. Seven of the 9 patients who failed the IHT, failed by a clear margin (peak cortisol < 85% of the lowest normal). Two of the 7 also failed all the ACTH [1-24] tests. Five of the 7 patients had discordant results, four passed the 0.1 LDT, one (out of four) passed the 0.5 LDT, none (out of three) passed the 1.0 LDT, two passed the HDT and three passed the 8-h test. Two patients were regarded as borderline fails in the IHT. Both passed the ACTH [1-24] tests, although one was a borderline pass in the 8-h test. Only five out of the 21 patients in group 3 showed discordance between the HDT and the LDTs. One patient passed the HDT and failed the 0.1 LDT, four patients failed the HDT but passed some of the different LDTS. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in the diagnosis of central hypoadrenalism, ACTH [1-24] stimulation tests may give misleading results compared to the IHT. The use of low bolus doses of ACTH [1-24] (1.0, 0.5 or 0.1 microg) or a high dose prolonged infusion does not greatly improve the sensitivity of ACTH [1-24] testing. Dynamic tests that provide a central stimulus remain preferable in the assessment of patients with suspected ACTH deficiency.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Low doses of ACTH [1-24] (0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 microg per 1.73 m2) may provide a more physiological level of adrenal stimulation than the standard 250 microg test, but not all studies have concluded that the 1.0 microg is a more sensitive screening test for central hypoadrenalism. Eight-hour infusions of high dose ACTH [1-24] have also been suggested as a means of assessing the adrenals' capacity for sustained cortisol secretion. In this study, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of three low dose ACTH tests (LDTs) and the 8-h infusion with the standard 250 microg test (HDT) and the insulin hypoglycaemia test (IHT) in patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease. SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: Three groups of subjects were studied. A healthy control group (group 1, n = 9) and 33 patients with known hypothalamic or pituitary disease who were divided into group 2 (n = 12, underwent IHT) and group 3 (n = 21, IHT contraindicated). Six different tests were performed: a standard IHT (0.15 U/kg soluble insulin); a 60-minute 250 microg HDT; three different LDTs using 0.1 microg, 0.5 microg and 1.0 microg (all per 1.73 m2); and an 8-h infusion test (250 microg ACTH [1-24] at a constant rate over 8 h). RESULTS: Nine out of the 12 patients in group 2 failed the IHT. Three out of 12 patients from group 2 who clearly passed the IHT, also passed all the ACTH [1-24] stimulation tests. Seven of the 9 patients who failed the IHT, failed by a clear margin (peak cortisol < 85% of the lowest normal). Two of the 7 also failed all the ACTH [1-24] tests. Five of the 7 patients had discordant results, four passed the 0.1 LDT, one (out of four) passed the 0.5 LDT, none (out of three) passed the 1.0 LDT, two passed the HDT and three passed the 8-h test. Two patients were regarded as borderline fails in the IHT. Both passed the ACTH [1-24] tests, although one was a borderline pass in the 8-h test. Only five out of the 21 patients in group 3 showed discordance between the HDT and the LDTs. One patient passed the HDT and failed the 0.1 LDT, four patients failed the HDT but passed some of the different LDTS. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in the diagnosis of central hypoadrenalism, ACTH [1-24] stimulation tests may give misleading results compared to the IHT. The use of low bolus doses of ACTH [1-24] (1.0, 0.5 or 0.1 microg) or a high dose prolonged infusion does not greatly improve the sensitivity of ACTH [1-24] testing. Dynamic tests that provide a central stimulus remain preferable in the assessment of patients with suspected ACTH deficiency.
Authors: Stephan Petersenn; Hans-Jürgen Quabbe; Christof Schöfl; Günter K Stalla; Klaus von Werder; Michael Buchfelder Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2010-06-25 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: R S Wijesurendra; F Bernard; J Outtrim; B Maiya; S Joshi; P J Hutchinson; D J Halsall; D K Menon Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2009-04-29 Impact factor: 3.210