Literature DB >> 16378618

Stainless steel electrospray probe: a dead end for phosphorylated organic compounds?

R Tuytten1, F Lemière, E Witters, W Van Dongen, H Slegers, R P Newton, H Van Onckelen, E L Esmans.   

Abstract

A study of the interaction of phosphorylated organic compounds with the stainless components of a liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation-mass spectrometry system (LC-ESI-MS) was carried out to disclose a (forgotten?) likely pitfall in the LC-ESI-MS analysis of phosphorylated compounds. The retention behaviour of some representative compounds of different important classes of phosphorylated biomolecules such as nucleotides, oligonucleotides, phosphopeptides, phospholipids and phosphorylated sugars was investigated during their passage through the injector and the stainless steel electrospray capillary. It became clear that the stainless steel components within the LC-ESI-MS setup were able to retain and trap phosphorylated compounds when these compounds were introduced under acidic conditions (0.1% acetic acid). Their release from these stainless steel parts was accomplished by applying an extreme basic mobile phase (25-50% ammonium hydroxide, ca. pH 12). From the data collected one could conclude that the availability of a primary phosphate group appeared imperative but was not always sufficient to realise adsorption on a stainless surface. Furthermore, the number of phosphate moieties seemed to enhance the adsorption properties of the molecules and hence roughly correlated with the analyte fraction lost. Corrosion of the inner surface caused by the mobile phase and the electrospray process was found to be an important factor in the course of these adsorption phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16378618     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  8 in total

1.  Simultaneous quantification of intracellular natural and antiretroviral nucleosides and nucleotides by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Emilie Fromentin; Christina Gavegnano; Aleksandr Obikhod; Raymond F Schinazi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Peptide fragmentation by corona discharge induced electrochemical ionization.

Authors:  John R Lloyd; Sonja Hess
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Integrated workflow for characterizing intact phosphoproteins from complex mixtures.

Authors:  Si Wu; Feng Yang; Rui Zhao; Nikola Tolić; Errol W Robinson; David G Camp; Richard D Smith; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolić
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Lipid profiling of the filarial nematodes Onchocerca volvulus, Onchocerca ochengi and Litomosoides sigmodontis reveals the accumulation of nematode-specific ether phospholipids in the host.

Authors:  Vera Wewer; Benjamin L Makepeace; Vincent N Tanya; Helga Peisker; Kenneth Pfarr; Achim Hoerauf; Peter Dörmann
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 3.981

5.  Saccharide Primers Comprising Xylosyl-Serine Primed Phosphorylated Oligosaccharides Act as Intermediates in Glycosaminoglycan Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Yuya Otsuka; Toshinori Sato
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-07-03

6.  Functional analysis of isoprenoid precursors biosynthesis by quantitative metabolomics and isotopologue profiling.

Authors:  Sara Castaño-Cerezo; Hanna Kulyk-Barbier; Pierre Millard; Jean-Charles Portais; Stéphanie Heux; Gilles Truan; Floriant Bellvert
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.290

7.  Metabolic profiling as a powerful tool for the analysis of cellular alterations caused by 20 mycotoxins in HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Andrea Gerdemann; Matthias Behrens; Melanie Esselen; Hans-Ulrich Humpf
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 6.168

8.  Intake of myo-inositol hexaphosphate and urinary excretion of inositol phosphates in Wistar rats: Gavage vs. oral administration with sugar.

Authors:  F Grases; A Costa-Bauzá; F Berga; R M Gomila; G Martorell; M R Martínez-Cignoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.