Literature DB >> 16378010

Outcomes of inferonasal Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant surgery.

Kara Hoffman Harbick1, Paul A Sidoti, Donald L Budenz, Anna Venkatraman, Megan Bruther, Douglas K Grayson, Anne Ko, Glara N Yi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the outcomes of inferonasal Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, non-comparative case series of 182 eyes of 182 patients who underwent inferonasal placement of a Baerveldt glaucoma implant. The main outcome measures included intraocular pressure, number of glaucoma medications, best corrected visual acuity, and complications.
RESULTS: Patients were followed for an average (+/- SD) of 19 +/- 15 months. Median Snellen visual acuity was unchanged at last follow-up. Intraocular pressure was reduced from a mean (+/- SD) of 28.6 +/- 11.5 mm Hg preoperatively to 13.4 +/- 5.7 mm Hg at most recent follow-up (P < 0.001). The number of antiglaucoma medications was reduced from a mean (+/- SD) of 2.7 +/- 1.3 preoperatively to 1.1 +/- 1.1 at most recent follow-up. Nineteen eyes met our criteria for failure, yielding a cumulative percent survival of 92% at 12 months, 88% at 24 months, and 77% at 44 months. The most common complications were hyphema (14 eyes, 8%), choroidal effusion (12 eyes, 7%), and corneal decompensation (19 eyes, 10%). Endophthalmitis and diplopia occurred rarely (1 eye, <1%; 3 eyes, 2%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Inferonasal Baerveldt glaucoma implant placement appears to be a safe and effective surgical option that may be helpful in certain clinical situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16378010     DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000195597.30600.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  11 in total

1.  Binocular disturbance after glaucoma drainage device implantation.

Authors:  Ta Chen Chang; Kara M Cavuoto
Journal:  World J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-12

2.  Diplopia in Medically and Surgically Treated Patients with Glaucoma.

Authors:  Philip Y Sun; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes; Cheryl L Khanna
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 3.  A Review on Glaucoma Drainage Devices and its Complications.

Authors:  Sajal Gupta; Sandhya Jeria
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-12

4.  Surgical outcomes of superior versus inferior glaucoma drainage device implantation.

Authors:  Amy Z Martino; Shawn Iverson; William J Feuer; David S Greenfield
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Modern concepts in antiglaucomatous implant surgery.

Authors:  T S Dietlein; J Jordan; C Lueke; G K Krieglstein
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Motility disturbances in the tube versus trabeculectomy study during the first year of follow-up.

Authors:  Frederick M Rauscher; Steven J Gedde; Joyce C Schiffman; William J Feuer; Keith Barton; Richard K Lee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 7.  Evaluating glaucoma surgeries in the MIGS context.

Authors:  Deepika Dhingra; Shibal Bhartiya
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun

8.  Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits.

Authors:  Birthe Schwerk; Lisa Harder; Claudia Windhövel; Marion Hewicker-Trautwein; Anna Wagner; Jan-Peter Bach; Lena Carolin Voigt; Ulf Hinze; Boris Chichkov; Heinz Haferkamp; Holger Lubatschowski; Stephan Nikolic; Ingo Nolte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Plate size reduction surgery for the Baerveldt 350-mm2 glaucoma implant for postoperative motor disturbance: A case report.

Authors:  Hirotaka Tanabe; Shunsuke Nakakura; Asuka Noguchi; Hitoshi Tabuchi; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Clinical outcome of a nonvalved Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in posterior segment versus anterior chamber.

Authors:  Devendra Maheshwari; Shylesh Dabke; Sindhushree Rajagopal; Mohideen A Kadar; Rengappa Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.