Literature DB >> 16377496

Care after colonic operation--is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States.

Henrik Kehlet1, Markus W Büchler, Robert W Beart, Richard P Billingham, Russell Williamson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite clinical evidence showing that steps can be taken perioperatively to enhance postoperative recovery and decrease morbidity in colonic operation patients, there is no comprehensive information on how widespread such practices are, or the combination of such steps into effective multimodal rehabilitation (fast-track) colonic surgery programs to decrease hospital stay. This survey investigated clinical practice around colonic operations across Europe and the United States.
METHODS: The survey was conducted in 295 hospitals in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United States. Details of perioperative care and postoperative recovery were recorded for 1,082 patients who had undergone elective colonic operations and who were discharged (or died) over a 2-week period (United States: up to 4 weeks).
RESULTS: Preoperative bowel clearance was used in >85% of patients. A nasogastric tube was left in situ postoperatively in 40% versus 66% of patients in the United States and Europe, respectively, and was removed about 3 days postoperatively. It took 3 to 4 days until 50% of the patients first tolerated liquids and 4 to 5 days until 50% of patients were eating and having a bowel movement. Postoperative ileus was found to persist for over 5 days in approximately 45% of patients. Mean length of postoperative hospital stay was over 10 days in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, and 7 days in the United States, compared with 2 to 5 days reported in trials of fast-track colonic surgery programs.
CONCLUSIONS: Strategies that can contribute to improved recovery and reduced complications after colonic operations do not appear to be applied optimally in clinical practice across Europe and the United States. These findings indicate a potential for major improvements in outcomes and reduction of costs if peri- and postoperative care can be adjusted to be in line with published evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16377496     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  66 in total

1.  Feasibility of enhanced recovery programme in various patient groups.

Authors:  Paul M Verheijen; Anthony W H Vd Ven; Paul H P Davids; Bryan J M Vd Wall; Apollo Pronk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The effect of clinical pathways for bariatric surgery on perioperative quality of care.

Authors:  Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Matthias Schwarzbach; Anne Kring; Peter Kienle; Stefan Post; Till Hasenberg
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Fast-track for the modern colorectal department.

Authors:  Rishabh Sehgal; Arnold Hill; Joseph Deasy; Deborah A McNamara; Ronan A Cahill
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Review of the pathophysiology and management of postoperative ileus.

Authors:  Peter Mattei; John L Rombeau
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Is nasogastric or nasojejunal decompression necessary after gastrectomy? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Nicolas Carrère; Patrick Seulin; Charles Henri Julio; Eric Bloom; Jean-Luc Gouzi; Bernard Pradère
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Future perspectives and research initiatives in fast-track surgery.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Impact of preoperative regular physical activity on postoperative course after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hayashi; Akihiro Hirashiki; Akio Kodama; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Yuto Yasukawa; Miho Shimizu; Takahisa Kondo; Kimihiro Komori; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Safety, feasibility, and tolerance of early oral feeding after colorectal resection outside an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program.

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Luca Nespoli; Laura Torselli; Mariarita Panelli; Angelo Nespoli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Mechanical bowel preparation and antimicrobial prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery in Switzerland--a survey.

Authors:  Adrian Businger; Gabriela Grunder; Marc-Olivier Guenin; Christoph Ackermann; Ralph Peterli; Markus von Flüe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Epidural analgesia diminished pain but did not otherwise improve enhanced recovery after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Pertti Turunen; Monika Carpelan-Holmström; Pekka Kairaluoma; Heidi Wikström; Olli Kruuna; Pertti Pere; Martina Bachmann; Seppo Sarna; Tom Scheinin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.