Literature DB >> 16377029

Surveillance for mupirocin resistance following introduction of routine peri-operative prophylaxis with nasal mupirocin.

W N Fawley1, P Parnell, J Hall, M H Wilcox.   

Abstract

The authors have previously described the successful use of a five-day peri-operative prophylaxis regimen using nasal mupirocin and topical triclosan (PPNMTT) to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. The present article describes the results of repeated point-prevalence surveillance for four years to determine whether mupirocin resistance has emerged in surgical units using empirical, short-term, peri-operative prophylaxis with nasal mupirocin. Before starting PPNMTT and every six months thereafter for four years, point-prevalence surveillance was performed for nasal S. aureus carriage in all patients on five orthopaedic surgery wards, one vascular surgery ward and one elderly medicine control ward. S. aureus screening and clinical isolates (surgical patients) were undertaken for low- [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 8-128 mg/L] and high-level (MIC > 128 mg/L) mupirocin resistance. All isolates were phage typed to determine whether there was evidence of the spread of clonal mupirocin-resistant strains. Of 593, 139 and 206 nasal screening swabs (taken after the regimen had started) from orthopaedic, vascular and control patients, 28%, 24% and 48% (orthopaedic/vascular surgery vs elderly medicine, P < 0.001) yielded S. aureus isolates, respectively, and 12%, 11% and 30% (P < 0.001) were MRSA positive, respectively. Of the S. aureus nasal screen isolates from orthopaedic/vascular surgery and control patients, 5% and 4%, respectively, were low-level mupirocin resistant (P > 0.1). Of 286 (orthopaedic/vascular surgery) and 68 (elderly medicine) clinical S. aureus isolates obtained after the regimen had started, 7% and 9% (P > 0.1), respectively, were low-level mupirocin resistant. No high-level mupirocin-resistant isolates were isolated from mupirocin (orthopaedic/vascular surgery) or elderly medicine control ward patients. There was no trend towards increasing prevalence of low-level mupirocin resistance during the four-year study period. The results of phage typing did not support the clonal spread of resistant strains. Long-term follow-up confirmed the efficacy of PPNMTT in reducing the prevalence of nasal carriage of S. aureus and MRSA in orthopaedic and vascular surgery patients. Despite four years of use of PPNMTT, there was no evidence of sustained emergence or spread of mupirocin resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16377029     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  13 in total

1.  Antimicrobial resistance and presence of ileS-2 gene encoding mupirocin resistance in clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus sp.

Authors:  E Szczuka; A Kaznowski; K Bosacka; E Strzemieczna
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 2.  Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns.

Authors:  Deborah A Williamson; Glen P Carter; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Preoperative Octenidine Application in Breast Reconstruction Surgery.

Authors:  Jens Hachenberg; Christian Eichler; Ellen Acis; Maximilian Mattes Auer-Schmidt; Mathias Warm; Wolfram Malter; Fabinshy Thangarajah
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Efficacy of topically delivered moxifloxacin against wound infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  F Jacobsen; C Fisahn; M Sorkin; I Thiele; T Hirsch; I Stricker; T Klaassen; A Roemer; B Fugmann; L Steinstraesser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: clinical implications and treatment.

Authors:  David Friedel; Michael Climo
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Mupirocin/chlorexidine to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: post hoc analysis of a placebo-controlled, randomized trial using mupirocin/chlorhexidine and polymyxin/tobramycin for the prevention of acquired infections in intubated patients.

Authors:  C Camus; V Sebille; A Legras; B Garo; A Renault; P Le Corre; P-Y Donnio; A Gacouin; D Perrotin; Y Le Tulzo; E Bellissant
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  A simple prophylaxis regimen for MRSA: its impact on the incidence of infection in patients undergoing liver resection.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Mukhtar; Vincent K H Wong; Hassan Z Malik; Mohammed Abu-Hilal; Miles Denton; Mark Wilcox; J Peter A Lodge; Giles J Toogood; K Rajendra Prasad
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 8.  Decolonization in Prevention of Health Care-Associated Infections.

Authors:  Edward J Septimus; Marin L Schweizer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Epidemiology and microbiological characterization of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in a single healthcare region of the UK, 2015.

Authors:  C Horner; L Utsi; L Coole; M Denton
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 10.  Mupirocin ointment for preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections in nasal carriers.

Authors:  Miranda van Rijen; Marc Bonten; Richard Wenzel; Jan Kluytmans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.