Literature DB >> 26817630

Decolonization in Prevention of Health Care-Associated Infections.

Edward J Septimus1, Marin L Schweizer2.   

Abstract

Colonization with health care-associated pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci, Gram-negative organisms, and Clostridium difficile is associated with increased risk of infection. Decolonization is an evidence-based intervention that can be used to prevent health care-associated infections (HAIs). This review evaluates agents used for nasal topical decolonization, topical (e.g., skin) decolonization, oral decolonization, and selective digestive or oropharyngeal decontamination. Although the majority of studies performed to date have focused on S. aureus decolonization, there is increasing interest in how to apply decolonization strategies to reduce infections due to Gram-negative organisms, especially those that are multidrug resistant. Nasal topical decolonization agents reviewed include mupirocin, bacitracin, retapamulin, povidone-iodine, alcohol-based nasal antiseptic, tea tree oil, photodynamic therapy, omiganan pentahydrochloride, and lysostaphin. Mupirocin is still the gold standard agent for S. aureus nasal decolonization, but there is concern about mupirocin resistance, and alternative agents are needed. Of the other nasal decolonization agents, large clinical trials are still needed to evaluate the effectiveness of retapamulin, povidone-iodine, alcohol-based nasal antiseptic, tea tree oil, omiganan pentahydrochloride, and lysostaphin. Given inferior outcomes and increased risk of allergic dermatitis, the use of bacitracin-containing compounds cannot be recommended as a decolonization strategy. Topical decolonization agents reviewed included chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), hexachlorophane, povidone-iodine, triclosan, and sodium hypochlorite. Of these, CHG is the skin decolonization agent that has the strongest evidence base, and sodium hypochlorite can also be recommended. CHG is associated with prevention of infections due to Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms as well as Candida. Conversely, triclosan use is discouraged, and topical decolonization with hexachlorophane and povidone-iodine cannot be recommended at this time. There is also evidence to support use of selective digestive decontamination and selective oropharyngeal decontamination, but additional studies are needed to assess resistance to these agents, especially selection for resistance among Gram-negative organisms. The strongest evidence for decolonization is for use among surgical patients as a strategy to prevent surgical site infections.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26817630      PMCID: PMC4786886          DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00049-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev        ISSN: 0893-8512            Impact factor:   26.132


  167 in total

1.  Selective lethal photosensitization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using an IgG-tin (IV) chlorin e6 conjugate.

Authors:  Michelle L Embleton; Sean P Nair; Barry D Cookson; Michael Wilson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Screening cardiac surgery patients for MRSA: an economic computer model.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Ann E Wiringa; Rachel R Bailey; Vishal Goyal; G Jonathan Lewis; Becky Y K Tsui; Kenneth J Smith; Robert R Muder
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Topical chlorhexidine for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maciej Piotr Chlebicki; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Perioperative intranasal mupirocin for the prevention of surgical-site infections: systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander J Kallen; Chad T Wilson; Robin J Larson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Multiple site surveillance cultures as a predictor of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Benedict Lim Heng Sim; Emma McBryde; Alan C Street; Caroline Marshall
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Chlorhexidine Only Works If Applied Correctly: Use of a Simple Colorimetric Assay to Provide Monitoring and Feedback on Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Application.

Authors:  Laura Supple; Monika Kumaraswami; Sirisha Kundrapu; Venkata Sunkesula; Jennifer L Cadnum; Michelle M Nerandzic; Myreen Tomas; Curtis J Donskey
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Evaluation of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis using a surface test.

Authors:  C Block; E Robenshtok; A Simhon; M Shapiro
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  Efficacy of triclosan as an antimicrobial hand soap and its potential impact on antimicrobial resistance: a focused review.

Authors:  Christopher A Giuliano; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.705

9.  Chlorhexidine gluconate to cleanse patients in a medical intensive care unit: the effectiveness of source control to reduce the bioburden of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  Michael O Vernon; Mary K Hayden; William E Trick; Robert A Hayes; Donald W Blom; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-02-13

Review 10.  Selective digestive or oropharyngeal decontamination and topical oropharyngeal chlorhexidine for prevention of death in general intensive care: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Price; Graeme MacLennan; John Glen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-03-31
View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial Resistance to Agents Used for Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization: Is There a Reason for Concern?

Authors:  Gregory R Madden; Costi D Sifri
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns.

Authors:  Deborah A Williamson; Glen P Carter; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Different photodynamic effects of blue light with and without riboflavin on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and human keratinocytes in vitro.

Authors:  Karim Makdoumi; Marie Hedin; Anders Bäckman
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Regional Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients Following State-Mandated Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Michael Y Lin; Mary K Hayden; Rosie D Lyles; Karen Lolans; Louis F Fogg; Alexander J Kallen; Stephen G Weber; Robert A Weinstein; William E Trick
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Chlorhexidine and Mupirocin Susceptibility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in the REDUCE-MRSA Trial.

Authors:  Mary K Hayden; Karen Lolans; Katherine Haffenreffer; Taliser R Avery; Ken Kleinman; Haiying Li; Rebecca E Kaganov; Julie Lankiewicz; Julia Moody; Edward Septimus; Robert A Weinstein; Jason Hickok; John Jernigan; Jonathan B Perlin; Richard Platt; Susan S Huang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Multidrug and Mupirocin Resistance in Environmental Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolates from Homes of People Diagnosed with Community-Onset MRSA Infection.

Authors:  J H Shahbazian; P D Hahn; S Ludwig; J Ferguson; P Baron; A Christ; K Spicer; P Tolomeo; A M Torrie; W B Bilker; V C Cluzet; B Hu; K Julian; I Nachamkin; S C Rankin; D O Morris; E Lautenbach; M F Davis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Preventing Transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Strich; Tara N Palmore
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.982

8.  Antiseptic Agents Elicit Short-Term, Personalized, and Body Site-Specific Shifts in Resident Skin Bacterial Communities.

Authors:  Adam J SanMiguel; Jacquelyn S Meisel; Joseph Horwinski; Qi Zheng; Charles W Bradley; Elizabeth A Grice
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Decreased Incidence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Intensive Care Units: a 10-Year Clinical, Microbiological, and Genotypic Analysis in a Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  Haein Kim; Eun Sil Kim; Seung Cheol Lee; Eunmi Yang; Hee Sueng Kim; Heungsup Sung; Mi-Na Kim; Jiwon Jung; Min Jae Kim; Sung-Han Kim; Sang-Oh Lee; Sang-Ho Choi; Jun Hee Woo; Yang Soo Kim; Yong Pil Chong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Genomic epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms.

Authors:  Shawn E Hawken; Evan S Snitkin
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.