Literature DB >> 16376161

Comparison of effective dose to children and adults from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations.

Glen M Blake1, Marium Naeem, Maria Boutros.   

Abstract

Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is increasingly used to measure bone density in children. If the system software does not include pediatric scan modes, then child examinations must be performed using adult scan modes that give a higher radiation dose to children than adults. This report describes a study to compare the effective dose to children and adults from DXA scans performed on the Hologic Discovery and QDR4500 models. Depth dose measurements were made using thermoluminescent dosimeters in a Rando phantom and were mapped onto the Cristy mathematical phantoms representing a 5-, 10- and 15-year-old child and an adult, and effective dose (ED) was calculated using the ICRP Publication-60 tissue weighting factors. The ED for spine (hip) examinations performed with the Express mode using the default adult scan lengths were 16.1 (9.8), 11.1 (6.7), 5.6 (3.9) and 4.4 (3.1) microSv for a 5-, 10- and 15-year-old child and adult respectively. However, if care is taken to adjust scan lengths appropriately, the child doses were reduced to 9.1 (7.4), 7.1 (5.9) and 5.0 (3.7) microSv. ED figures for the Fast and Array modes were larger by factors of 1.5 and 3 respectively. EDs for whole body scans for a 5-, 10- and 15-year-old child and adult performed on the A-model (W-model) were 5.2 (10.5), 4.8 (9.6), 4.2 (8.4) and 4.2 (8.4) microSv. Using the infant whole body mode (only available on the A-model), they were 7.5 microSv for a 1-year-old and 8.9 microSv for a neonate. Although doses from child DXA examinations are low, it is still important to keep them as small as possible. DXA operators using Discovery systems can do this by using the Express scan mode, by setting appropriate values of the scan length before scan acquisition and by avoiding mistakes that lead to scans having to be unnecessarily repeated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16376161     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  33 in total

Review 1.  Imaging approaches to understand disease complexity: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a clinical model.

Authors:  Karin J C Sanders; Samuel Y Ash; George R Washko; Felix M Mottaghy; Annemie M W J Schols
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-07-27

Review 2.  Quality assurance of imaging techniques used in the clinical management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; J Damilakis; G Solomou; A Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry prediction of adipose tissue depots in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jacqueline Bauer; John Thornton; Steven Heymsfield; Kim Kelly; Alexander Ramirez; Sonia Gidwani; Dympna Gallagher
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Osteoporosis Imaging in the Geriatric Patient.

Authors:  Ursula Heilmeier; Jiwon Youm; Soheyla Torabi; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2016-02-15

5.  Impaired Bone Mineral Density in Pediatric Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Authors:  Nataliya P Buxbaum; Cemre Robinson; Ninet Sinaii; Alexander Ling; Lauren M Curtis; Steven Z Pavletic; Kristin Baird; Maya B Lodish
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Long-Term Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Risk and Prognosis in Elderly Women With Abdominal Aortic Calcification on Lateral Spine Images Captured During Bone Density Testing: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Joshua R Lewis; John T Schousboe; Wai H Lim; Germaine Wong; Kevin E Wilson; Kun Zhu; Peter L Thompson; Douglas P Kiel; Richard L Prince
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Advanced Analysis Techniques Improve Infant Bone and Body Composition Measures by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Markus J Sommer; Bo Fan; Cassidy Powers; Lynda Stranix-Chibanda; Amanda Zadzilka; Michael Basar; Kathy George; Cynthia Mukwasi-Kahari; George Siberry
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Cross-Calibrated Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scanners Demonstrate Systematic Bias in Pediatric and Young Adult Females.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Kristen A Dunsmore; Dongliang Wang; Paula F Rosenbaum; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Radiation exposure from diagnostic procedures following allogeneic stem cell transplantation--how much is acceptable?

Authors:  Minoo Battiwalla; Farhad Fakhrejahani; Natasha A Jain; Jeffrey K Klotz; Priyanka A Pophali; Debbie Draper; Janice Haggerty; Zachariah McIver; James Jelinek; Kamna Chawla; Sawa Ito; John Barrett
Journal:  Hematology       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.269

10.  A paediatric bone index derived by automated radiogrammetry.

Authors:  H H Thodberg; R R van Rijn; T Tanaka; D D Martin; S Kreiborg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.