Literature DB >> 16374095

A simple and inexpensive method of preoperative computer imaging for rhinoplasty.

Christopher J Ewart1, Christopher J Leonard, J Garrett Harper, Jack Yu.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: GOALS/
PURPOSE: Despite concerns of legal liability, preoperative computer imaging has become a popular tool for the plastic surgeon. The ability to project possible surgical outcomes can facilitate communication between the patient and surgeon. It can be an effective tool in the education and training of residents. Unfortunately, these imaging programs are expensive and have a steep learning curve. The purpose of this paper is to present a relatively inexpensive method of preoperative computer imaging with a reasonable learning curve.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The price of currently available imaging programs was acquired through an online search, and inquiries were made to the software distributors. Their prices were compared to Adobe PhotoShop, which has special filters called "liquify" and "photocopy." It was used in the preoperative computer planning of 2 patients who presented for rhinoplasty at our institution. Projected images were created based on harmonious discussions between the patient and physician. Importantly, these images were presented to the patient as potential results, with no guarantees as to actual outcomes.
RESULTS: Adobe PhotoShop can be purchased for 900-5800 dollars less than the leading computer imaging software for cosmetic rhinoplasty. Effective projected images were created using the "liquify" and "photocopy" filters in PhotoShop. Both patients had surgical planning and operations based on these images. They were satisfied with the results.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative computer imaging can be a very effective tool for the plastic surgeon by providing improved physician-patient communication, increased patient confidence, and enhanced surgical planning. Adobe PhotoShop is a relatively inexpensive program that can provide these benefits using only 1 or 2 features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16374095     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000188204.22096.9d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  5 in total

1.  Rhinoplasty planning with an iPhone app: analysis of otolaryngologists response.

Authors:  Francesc Larrosa; Maria J Dura; Josep Roura; Anabella Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Three-dimensional Morphing and Its Added Value in the Rhinoplasty Consult.

Authors:  Garyfalia Lekakis; Greet Hens; Peter Claes; Peter W Hellings
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-01-04

3.  Prediction of face-lift outcomes using the preoperative supine test.

Authors:  Charles Hsu; Ronald P Gruber; Amarjit Dosanjh
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  A 3-Dimensional-Printed Short-Segment Template Prototype for Mandibular Fracture Repair.

Authors:  Parul Sinha; Gary Skolnick; Kamlesh B Patel; Gregory H Branham; John J Chi
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

5.  Use of an Autologous Diced Cartilage Graft and Fat Graft Combination to Improve Regeneration in Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Cemal Firat; Kağan Bekircan; Mehmet Fatih Algan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.326

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.