Literature DB >> 23371539

Rhinoplasty planning with an iPhone app: analysis of otolaryngologists response.

Francesc Larrosa1, Maria J Dura, Josep Roura, Anabella Hernandez.   

Abstract

The field of medical applications is currently one of the most dynamic in medicine due to the great potential for improving clinical practice they hold. However, clinicians' opinion around their usability in daily clinical care has not been thoroughly addressed. This study aimed to analyze the otolaryngologists response to a rhinoplasty application. It was designed as a survey of 21 otolaryngologists with regards to a rhinoplasty planning application for the iPhone with the capacity to project potential surgery outcomes through tactile morphing software compared to a photo tracing method used as the gold standard. The participants were asked to rate the usefulness of the two technologies on a visual analog scale from 0-10. Questions addressed included four topics: physician-patient communication; imaging process time; perceived usefulness for preoperative planning; and perceived usefulness for surgery. A one sample t-test was applied to compare the scores of both methods for each question. The test subjects (mean age 43.21 years) rated the utility of the iPhone application as superior to that of the photo tracing method (p < 0.05) concluding that the iPhone application could facilitate an immediate preliminary analysis of the options for nasal improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23371539     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2360-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  22 in total

1.  Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  S Wall; K Kazahaya; S S Becker; D G Becker
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.446

2.  Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs.

Authors:  Orrin I Franko; Timothy F Tirrell
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Photographic standards for facial plastic surgery.

Authors:  Jenifer Lee Henderson; Wayne F Larrabee; Brandan D Krieger
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

4.  Visual analogue scales for mode-independent measurement in self-administered questionnaires.

Authors:  Joacuim Gerich
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-11

5.  Smartphone applications for the plastic surgery trainee.

Authors:  Kavit Amin
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  A guide to the assessment and analysis of the rhinoplasty patient.

Authors:  Pietro Palma; Iman Khodaei; Abel-Jan Tasman
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 1.446

7.  Computer imaging and surgical reality in aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Wolfgang Mühlbauer; Charlotte Holm
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Analysis of patient response to preoperative computerized video imaging.

Authors:  J R Thomas; M S Freeman; D J Remmler; T K Ehlert
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1989-07

9.  Pitfalls of nonstandardized photography.

Authors:  David J Archibald; Matthew L Carlson; Oren Friedman
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.918

Review 10.  A 20-year review of the "new domes" technique for refining the drooping nasal tip.

Authors:  Fernando Pedroza
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Sep
View more
  1 in total

1.  Digitizing rhinoplasty: a web application with three-dimensional preoperative evaluation to assist rhinoplasty surgeons with surgical planning.

Authors:  Oguzhan Topsakal; Mustafa İlhan Akbaş; Doga Demirel; Rafael Nunez; Bria Synae Smith; Michael Francis Perez; Mehmet Mazhar Celikoyar
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 2.924

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.