Literature DB >> 16374090

Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.

G Mabel Gamboa-Bobadilla1.   

Abstract

Thirteen breast reconstructions in 11 patients, averaging 58 years of age, underwent mastectomies. The technique uses a saline implant either totally or partially covered with a human acellular dermal matrix. The mean postoperative follow-up time was 14 months. Ninety percent of the patients were considered high risk; the thickness of the human acellular dermal matrix was an average of 1.3 mm, with an average area per breast of 121 cm. There were 12 successful breast reconstructions (92%) that provided stability, increased soft tissue padding, which allowed a greater resemblance to normal breast shape and decreased rippling and implant visibility. The graft was used in an onlay fashion or as an extension of the pectoralis major muscle that covers the implant. A representative histologic cross-section of well-integrated human acellular dermal matrix is presented. The use of a human acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction is an alternative protocol in high-risk patients, resulting in a minimal increase in operative time and a decrease in morbidity compared with more extensive procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16374090     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000185460.31188.c1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  32 in total

1.  Acellular dermal matrices: Use in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery.

Authors:  Sheina A Macadam; Peter A Lennox
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Current strategies with 2-staged prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Christin Harless; Steven R Jacobson
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  The use of acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction: evolution of techniques over 2 decades.

Authors:  Ilana G Margulies; C Andrew Salzberg
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

Review 4.  Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel S Cabalag; Marie Rostek; George S Miller; Michael P Chae; Tam Quinn; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

Review 5.  Surgical perspectives regarding application of biomaterials for the management of large congenital diaphragmatic hernia defects.

Authors:  Amulya K Saxena
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Infectious Complications Leading to Explantation in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With AlloDerm.

Authors:  Minh-Doan Nguyen; Chen Chen; Salih Colakoğlu; Donald J Morris; Adam M Tobias; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-06-30

7.  Acellular Dermal Matrix as a Core Strut for Projection in Nipple Reconstruction: Approaches for Three Different Methods of Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gui-Yong Park; Eul-Sik Yoon; Hee-Eun Cho; Byung-Il Lee; Seung-Ha Park
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-09-21

8.  Clinical outcomes of percutaneous drainage of breast fluid collections after mastectomy with expander-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ricky T Tong; Maureen Kohi; Nicholas Fidelman; Yuo-Chen Kuo; Robert Foster; Anne Peled; K Pallav Kolli; Andrew G Taylor; Jeanne M LaBerge; Robert K Kerlan
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 9.  Extracellular matrix-derived biomaterials in engineering cell function.

Authors:  Hao Xing; Hudson Lee; Lijing Luo; Themis R Kyriakides
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 14.227

10.  Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ian C Hoppe; Janet H Yueh; Cindy H Wei; Naveen K Ahuja; Priti P Patel; Ramazi O Datiashvili
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.