Literature DB >> 16373658

Clinical implication of centrosome amplification in plasma cell neoplasm.

Wee J Chng1, Greg J Ahmann, Kim Henderson, Rafael Santana-Davila, Philip R Greipp, Morie A Gertz, Martha Q Lacy, Angela Dispenzieri, Shaji Kumar, S Vincent Rajkumar, John A Lust, Robert A Kyle, Steven R Zeldenrust, Suzanne R Hayman, Rafael Fonseca.   

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying aneuploidy in multiple myeloma (MM) are unclear. Centrosome amplification has been implicated as the cause of chromosomal instability in a variety of tumors and is a potential mechanism causing aneuploidy in MM. Using immunofluorescent (IF) staining, centrosome amplification was detected in 67% of monoclonal gammopathies, including monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). We also investigated the gene expression of centrosome proteins. Overall, gene expression data correlated well with IF-detected centrosome amplification, allowing us to derive a gene expression-based centrosome index (CI) as a surrogate for centrosome amplification. Clinically, MM patients with high CI (> 4) are associated with poor prognostic genetic and clinical subtypes (chromosome 13 deletion, t(4; 14), t(14;16), and PCLI > 1%, P < .05) and are shown here to have short survival (11.1 months versus 39.1 months, P < .001). On multivariate regression, a high CI is an independent prognostic factor. Given that centrosome amplification is already observed in MGUS and probably integral to early chromosomal instability and myeloma genesis, and patients with more extensive centrosome amplification have shorter survival, the mechanisms leading to centrosome amplification should be investigated because these may offer new avenues for therapeutic intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16373658      PMCID: PMC1895774          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  38 in total

Review 1.  Centrosome composition and microtubule anchoring mechanisms.

Authors:  Michel Bornens
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 2.  Centrosome aberrations: cause or consequence of cancer progression?

Authors:  Erich A Nigg
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Centrosome amplification and the development of cancer.

Authors:  Antonino B D'Assoro; Wilma L Lingle; Jeffrey L Salisbury
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-09-09       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Centrosome abnormalities in human carcinomas of the gallbladder and intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts.

Authors:  K K Kuo; N Sato; K Mizumoto; N Maehara; H Yonemasu; C G Ker; P C Sheen; M Tanaka
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 5.  Centrosome replication, genomic instability and cancer.

Authors:  A Krämer; K Neben; A D Ho
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  The proliferative potential of myeloma plasma cells manifest in the SCID-hu host.

Authors:  S Yaccoby; J Epstein
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Centrosome hyperamplification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a potential phenotypic marker of tumor aggressiveness.

Authors:  L M Gustafson; L L Gleich; K Fukasawa; J Chadwell; M A Miller; P J Stambrook; J L Gluckman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development.

Authors:  Wilma L Lingle; Susan L Barrett; Vivian C Negron; Antonino B D'Assoro; Kelly Boeneman; Wanguo Liu; Clark M Whitehead; Carol Reynolds; Jeffrey L Salisbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Centrosome defects can account for cellular and genetic changes that characterize prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  G A Pihan; A Purohit; J Wallace; R Malhotra; L Liotta; S J Doxsey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Excessive centrosome abnormalities without ongoing numerical chromosome instability in a Burkitt's lymphoma.

Authors:  Stefan Duensing; Benjamin H Lee; Paola Dal Cin; Karl Münger
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 27.401

View more
  36 in total

1.  Standard and novel imaging methods for multiple myeloma: correlates with prognostic laboratory variables including gene expression profiling data.

Authors:  Sarah Waheed; Alan Mitchell; Saad Usmani; Joshua Epstein; Shmuel Yaccoby; Bijay Nair; Rudy van Hemert; Edgardo Angtuaco; Tracy Brown; Twyla Bartel; James McDonald; Elias Anaissie; Frits van Rhee; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  β-catenin is dynamically stored and cleared in multiple myeloma by the proteasome-aggresome-autophagosome-lysosome pathway.

Authors:  K Sukhdeo; M Mani; T Hideshima; K Takada; V Pena-Cruz; G Mendez; S Ito; K C Anderson; D R Carrasco
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Extramedullary disease portends poor prognosis in multiple myeloma and is over-represented in high-risk disease even in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Saad Z Usmani; Christoph Heuck; Alan Mitchell; Jackie Szymonifka; Bijay Nair; Antje Hoering; Yazan Alsayed; Sarah Waheed; Sajjad Haider; Alejandro Restrepo; Frits Van Rhee; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Structural and Functional Analyses of the FAM46C/Plk4 Complex.

Authors:  Hua Chen; Defen Lu; Guijun Shang; Guoming Gao; Xuewu Zhang
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Hyperhaploidy is a novel high-risk cytogenetic subgroup in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J R Sawyer; E Tian; J D Shaughnessy; J Epstein; C M Swanson; C Stangeby; C L Hale; L Parr; M Lynn; G Sammartino; J L Lukacs; C Stein; C Bailey; M Zangari; F E Davies; F Van Rhee; B Barlogie; G J Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 6.  Engaging Anaphase Catastrophe Mechanisms to Eradicate Aneuploid Cancers.

Authors:  Masanori Kawakami; Lisa Maria Mustachio; Xi Liu; Ethan Dmitrovsky
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 6.261

7.  Hypodiploid multiple myeloma is characterized by more aggressive molecular markers than non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Scott Van Wier; Esteban Braggio; Angela Baker; Gregory Ahmann; Joan Levy; John D Carpten; Rafael Fonseca
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  TRIGGERING ANAPHASE CATASTROPHE TO COMBAT ANEUPLOID CANCERS.

Authors:  Ethan Dmitrovsky; Masanori Kawakami; X I Liu; Sarah J Freemantle; Jonathan M Kurie
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2020

Review 9.  The molecular characterization and clinical management of multiple myeloma in the post-genome era.

Authors:  Y Zhou; B Barlogie; J D Shaughnessy
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 10.  Centrosomes and myeloma; aneuploidy and proliferation.

Authors:  Wee J Chng; Rafael Fonseca
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.