Literature DB >> 16373455

Dynamics of frontal, striatal, and hippocampal systems during rule learning.

Carol A Seger1, Corinna M Cincotta.   

Abstract

We examined interactions between frontal, striatal, and hippocampal systems during a rule-learning task. Nineteen healthy young adults solved multiple rule-learning problems requiring hypothesis testing while functional magnetic resonance images were obtained. Activity in the head of the caudate peaked early after the beginning of each problem and then dropped rapidly. In contrast, activity in prefrontal cortex areas reached peak values later. These results are in accordance with theories suggesting that the striatum identifies the behavioral context necessary for the frontal lobe to select an appropriate strategy. Striatal and hippocampal systems showed antagonistic patterns of activity: Activation in the anterior hippocampus decreased, whereas caudate activity increased. Good learners showed higher activity in the body and tail of the caudate than poor learners, whereas learning success correlated negatively with activity in the hippocampus. Activation in the head of the caudate correlated negatively with hippocampal activation, indicating a potential mechanism for hippocampal activity reduction.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16373455     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  79 in total

1.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia contributions to visual working memory.

Authors:  Bradley Voytek; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  A rostro-caudal gradient of structured sequence processing in the left inferior frontal gyrus.

Authors:  Julia Uddén; Jörg Bahlmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Computational Models Inform Clinical Science and Assessment: An Application to Category Learning in Striatal-Damaged Patients.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; J Vincent Filoteo; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  Conditional and syllogistic deductive tasks dissociate functionally during premise integration.

Authors:  Carlo Reverberi; Paolo Cherubini; Richard S J Frackowiak; Carlo Caltagirone; Eraldo Paulesu; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The dimensionality of perceptual category learning: a state-trace analysis.

Authors:  Ben R Newell; John C Dunn; Michael Kalish
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

Review 6.  Human category learning 2.0.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Distinct mechanisms in visual category learning.

Authors:  Joe DeGutis; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Frontoparietal networks involved in categorization and item working memory.

Authors:  Kurt Braunlich; Javier Gomez-Lavin; Carol A Seger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Dissociating the contributions of independent corticostriatal systems to visual categorization learning through the use of reinforcement learning modeling and Granger causality modeling.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson; Corinna M Cincotta; Dan Lopez-Paniagua; Charles W Anderson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  A Comparison of the neural correlates that underlie rule-based and information-integration category learning.

Authors:  Kathryn L Carpenter; Andy J Wills; Abdelmalek Benattayallah; Fraser Milton
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.