BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) had the potential to inhibit cell proliferation of prostate cancer. In this study, we examined whether an ARB could elicit an antiproliferative effect on hormone-refractory prostate cancer, clinically. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer who had already received secondary hormonal therapy using dexamethasone, and who were no longer receiving conventional therapy, were enrolled. All of the patients received candesartan 8 mg once daily per os and, simultaneously, androgen ablation. Change in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was determined as the primary endpoint. The secondary end-point was change in performance status (PS). To investigate angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor expression in prostate cancer tissue, real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed, using specimens, from untreated patients with prostate cancer. RESULTS: Eight patients (34.8%) showed responsive PSA changes; six showed a decrease immediately after starting administration and two showed a stable level of PSA. Six men with a PSA decline of more than 50% showed an improvement in PS. The mean time to PSA progression (TTPP) in responders was 8.3 months (range, 1-24 months). Half of the patients showed stable or improved PS during treatment. With regard to toxic effects, only one patient showed hypotension during treatment. The RT-PCR showed that AT1 receptor expression in well-differentiated adenocarcinoma was higher than that in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: These data showed that an ARB had potential biological effects on prostate cancer, suggesting the usefulness of the cytostatic activity of such agents on recurrent prostate cancer.
BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) had the potential to inhibit cell proliferation of prostate cancer. In this study, we examined whether an ARB could elicit an antiproliferative effect on hormone-refractory prostate cancer, clinically. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer who had already received secondary hormonal therapy using dexamethasone, and who were no longer receiving conventional therapy, were enrolled. All of the patients received candesartan 8 mg once daily per os and, simultaneously, androgen ablation. Change in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was determined as the primary endpoint. The secondary end-point was change in performance status (PS). To investigate angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor expression in prostate cancer tissue, real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed, using specimens, from untreated patients with prostate cancer. RESULTS: Eight patients (34.8%) showed responsive PSA changes; six showed a decrease immediately after starting administration and two showed a stable level of PSA. Six men with a PSA decline of more than 50% showed an improvement in PS. The mean time to PSA progression (TTPP) in responders was 8.3 months (range, 1-24 months). Half of the patients showed stable or improved PS during treatment. With regard to toxic effects, only one patient showed hypotension during treatment. The RT-PCR showed that AT1 receptor expression in well-differentiated adenocarcinoma was higher than that in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: These data showed that an ARB had potential biological effects on prostate cancer, suggesting the usefulness of the cytostatic activity of such agents on recurrent prostate cancer.
Authors: W D Figg; W Dahut; P Duray; M Hamilton; A Tompkins; S M Steinberg; E Jones; A Premkumar; W M Linehan; M K Floeter; C C Chen; S Dixon; D R Kohler; E A Krüger; E Gubish; J M Pluda; E Reed Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M Sano; K Fukuda; T Sato; H Kawaguchi; M Suematsu; S Matsuda; S Koyasu; H Matsui; K Yamauchi-Takihara; M Harada; Y Saito; S Ogawa Journal: Circ Res Date: 2001-10-12 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: G J Bubley; M Carducci; W Dahut; N Dawson; D Daliani; M Eisenberger; W D Figg; B Freidlin; S Halabi; G Hudes; M Hussain; R Kaplan; C Myers; W Oh; D P Petrylak; E Reed; B Roth; O Sartor; H Scher; J Simons; V Sinibaldi; E J Small; M R Smith; D L Trump; G Wilding Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Glenn Liu; Kurt Oettel; Gregory Ripple; Mary Jane Staab; Dorothea Horvath; Dona Alberti; Rhoda Arzoomanian; Rebecca Marnocha; Reginald Bruskewitz; Richard Mazess; Charles Bishop; Abhik Bhattacharya; Howard Bailey; George Wilding Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Daniel P Petrylak; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Donna Berry; Carol Moinpour; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Y Nakai; H Isayama; H Ijichi; T Sasaki; N Sasahira; K Hirano; H Kogure; K Kawakubo; H Yagioka; Y Yashima; S Mizuno; K Yamamoto; T Arizumi; O Togawa; S Matsubara; T Tsujino; K Tateishi; M Tada; M Omata; K Koike Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Gowtham A Rao; Joshua R Mann; Matteo Bottai; Hiroji Uemura; James B Burch; Charles Lee Bennett; Kathlyn Sue Haddock; James R Hébert Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: José A Carlos-Escalante; Marcela de Jesús-Sánchez; Alejandro Rivas-Castro; Pavel S Pichardo-Rojas; Claudia Arce; Talia Wegman-Ostrosky Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 6.244