Bernard Friedenson1. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Germline mutations in the tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose women to breast and ovarian cancer. Female carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations have very high lifetime risks for breast and ovarian cancers. Genetic abnormalities occur in all cancers, so BRCA-related pathways are critical because they serve to safeguard genetic content. Although protecting genetic information is a general function, BRCA-related pathways seem largely specific to preventing breast and ovarian cancer. The objective of this study was to resolve this difference between the theoretical functions of BRCA genes and their specific clinical effects. DATA SOURCES, DATA EXTRACTION, DATA SYNTHESIS: The author collected data published in > 30 epidemiologic studies on the incidence of cancers other than breast or ovarian in mutation carriers and in large populations eligible for mutation testing. Data were extracted and used directly as published whenever possible with a minimum of statistical manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Although mutations target breast and ovary, a broader spectrum of cancers also occur with statistically significant elevated frequencies. Risks for "all cancers except breast or ovary" are elevated, with some population subgroups differing with regard to how frequently elevated risks were found at individual sites. Additional sites at risk included stomach, pancreas, prostate, and colon. The increased risk ranged from about 20% to 60%, with the greatest increases in risk in stomach and pancreas. The collected data show BRCA-pathway functions are probably required at multiple sites, not just in breast or ovary. Known interactions and relationships among BRCA-related pathways strongly support the idea that their inactivation provides growth or survival advantages for a variety of cancers. The data suggest applying an increased level of clinical alertness to those with defects in BRCA-related pathways. Identifying molecules that confer growth or survival advantages to BRCA-related cancers may provide broadly useful targets for chemotherapy or chemoprevention.
OBJECTIVE: Germline mutations in the tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose women to breast and ovarian cancer. Female carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations have very high lifetime risks for breast and ovarian cancers. Genetic abnormalities occur in all cancers, so BRCA-related pathways are critical because they serve to safeguard genetic content. Although protecting genetic information is a general function, BRCA-related pathways seem largely specific to preventing breast and ovarian cancer. The objective of this study was to resolve this difference between the theoretical functions of BRCA genes and their specific clinical effects. DATA SOURCES, DATA EXTRACTION, DATA SYNTHESIS: The author collected data published in > 30 epidemiologic studies on the incidence of cancers other than breast or ovarian in mutation carriers and in large populations eligible for mutation testing. Data were extracted and used directly as published whenever possible with a minimum of statistical manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Although mutations target breast and ovary, a broader spectrum of cancers also occur with statistically significant elevated frequencies. Risks for "all cancers except breast or ovary" are elevated, with some population subgroups differing with regard to how frequently elevated risks were found at individual sites. Additional sites at risk included stomach, pancreas, prostate, and colon. The increased risk ranged from about 20% to 60%, with the greatest increases in risk in stomach and pancreas. The collected data show BRCA-pathway functions are probably required at multiple sites, not just in breast or ovary. Known interactions and relationships among BRCA-related pathways strongly support the idea that their inactivation provides growth or survival advantages for a variety of cancers. The data suggest applying an increased level of clinical alertness to those with defects in BRCA-related pathways. Identifying molecules that confer growth or survival advantages to BRCA-related cancers may provide broadly useful targets for chemotherapy or chemoprevention.
Authors: Jose Iscovich; Mohammed Abdulrazik; Carol Cour; Alf Fischbein; Jacob Pe'er; David E Goldgar Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Stephen M Edwards; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Julia Meitz; Rifat Hamoudi; Questa Hope; Peter Osin; Rachel Jackson; Christine Southgate; Rashmi Singh; Alison Falconer; David P Dearnaley; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Annette Murkin; Anna Dowe; Jo Kelly; Sue Williams; Richard Oram; Margaret Stevens; Dawn M Teare; Bruce A J Ponder; Simon A Gayther; Doug F Easton; Rosalind A Eeles Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-12-09 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Rodney J Scott; Claire M Vajdic; Bruce K Armstrong; Christopher J Ainsworth; Cliff J Meldrum; Joanne F Aitken; Anne Kricker Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2002-11-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Marcia S Brose; Timothy R Rebbeck; Kathleen A Calzone; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Barbara L Weber Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-09-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Stephan A Hahn; Bill Greenhalf; Ian Ellis; Mercedes Sina-Frey; Harald Rieder; Birgit Korte; Berthold Gerdes; Ralf Kress; Andreas Ziegler; John A Raeburn; Donata Campra; Robert Grützmann; Helga Rehder; Matthias Rothmund; Wolff Schmiegel; John P Neoptolemos; Detlef K Bartsch Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-02-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Niall G Howlett; Toshiyasu Taniguchi; Susan Olson; Barbara Cox; Quinten Waisfisz; Christine De Die-Smulders; Nicole Persky; Markus Grompe; Hans Joenje; Gerard Pals; Hideyuki Ikeda; Edward A Fox; Alan D D'Andrea Journal: Science Date: 2002-06-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: R Chen-Shtoyerman; A Figer; H H Fidder; P Rath; L Yeremin; S Bar Meir; E Friedman; L Theodor Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Irma Kluijt; Rolf H Sijmons; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; John T Plukker; Daphne de Jong; J Han van Krieken; Richard van Hillegersberg; Marjolijn Ligtenberg; Eveline Bleiker; Anemieke Cats Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Sanna Pakkanen; Tiina Wahlfors; Sanna Siltanen; Mimmi Patrikainen; Mika P Matikainen; Teuvo L J Tammela; Johanna Schleutker Journal: J Negat Results Biomed Date: 2009-12-15
Authors: Evelina Mocci; Roger L Milne; Elena Yuste Méndez-Villamil; John L Hopper; Esther M John; Irene L Andrulis; Wendy K Chung; Mary Daly; Saundra S Buys; Nuria Malats; David E Goldgar Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Vladimir M Moiseyenko; Nikita M Volkov; Evgeny N Suspistin; Grigoriy A Yanus; Aglaya G Iyevleva; Ekatherina Sh Kuligina; Alexandr V Togo; Alexandr V Kornilov; Alexandr O Ivantsov; Evgeny N Imyanitov Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: M T Branham; E Campoy; S Laurito; R Branham; G Urrutia; J Orozco; F Gago; R Urrutia; M Roqué Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Andreas Palagyi; Kornelia Neveling; Ursula Plinninger; Andreas Ziesch; Bianca-Sabrina Targosz; Gerald U Denk; Stephanie Ochs; Antonia Rizzani; Daniel Meier; Wolfgang E Thasler; Helmut Hanenberg; Enrico N De Toni; Florian Bassermann; Claus Schäfer; Burkhard Göke; Detlev Schindler; Eike Gallmeier Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 27.401