Literature DB >> 16368202

The rise and fall of the CR1 subfamily in the lineage leading to penguins.

Maiko Watanabe1, Masato Nikaido, Tomi T Tsuda, Hidetoshi Inoko, David P Mindell, Koichi Murata, Norihiro Okada.   

Abstract

The evolution of penguins has been investigated extensively, although inconclusively, by morphologists, biogeographers and molecular phylogeneticists. We investigated this issue using retroposon analysis of insertions of CR1, which is a member of the LINE (long interspersed element) family, in the genomes of penguins and penguin relatives. The retroposon method is a powerful tool for identifying monophyletic groups. Because retroposons often show different relative frequencies of retroposition during evolution, it is first necessary to identify a certain subgroup that was specifically active during the period when the species in question diverged. Hence, we systematically analyzed many CR1 members isolated from penguin and penguin-related genomes. These CR1s are divided into at least three distinct subgroups that share diagnostic nucleotide insertions and/or deletions, namely, penguin CR1 Sph I, Sph II type A and Sph II type B. The analysis of the inserted retroposons by PCR revealed that different CR1 subfamilies or types had amplified at different rates among different periods during penguin evolution. Namely, the penguin CR1 Sph I subfamily had higher rates of retroposition in a common ancestor of all orders examined in this study or at least in a common ancestor of all extant penguins, and the subfamily Sph II type A also had the same tendency. Therefore, these CR1 members can be used to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships of Sphenisciformes (penguins) among different avian orders. In contrast, the penguin CR1 Sph II type B subfamily had higher rates of retroposition just before and after the emergence of the extant genera in Spheniscidae, suggesting that they are useful for elucidating the intra-relationships among extant penguins. This is the first report for the characterization among the members of CR1 family in avian genomes excluding those of chickens. Hence, this work will be a cornerstone for elucidating the phylogenetic relationships in penguin evolution using the retroposon method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16368202     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.09.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  12 in total

1.  Laboratory methods for the analysis of primate mobile elements.

Authors:  David A Ray; Kyudong Han; Jerilyn A Walker; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

2.  Tandem duplications in the C-terminal domain of the mesotocin receptor exclusively identified among East Eurasian thrushes.

Authors:  Hideaki Abe; Isao Nishiumi; Miho Inoue-Murayama
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Multiple nuclear genes and retroposons support vicariance and dispersal of the palaeognaths, and an Early Cretaceous origin of modern birds.

Authors:  Oliver Haddrath; Allan J Baker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evolution of serum albumin intron-1 is shaped by a 5' truncated non-long terminal repeat retrotransposon in western Palearctic water frogs (Neobatrachia).

Authors:  Jörg Plötner; Frank Köhler; Thomas Uzzell; Peter Beerli; Robert Schreiber; Gaston-Denis Guex; Hansjürg Hotz
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 5.  SINEs as Credible Signs to Prove Common Ancestry in the Tree of Life: A Brief Review of Pioneering Case Studies in Retroposon Systematics.

Authors:  Masato Nikaido; Hidenori Nishihara; Norihiro Okada
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.141

6.  Calibration of mutation rates reveals diverse subfamily structure of galliform CR1 repeats.

Authors:  George E Liu; Lu Jiang; Fei Tian; Bin Zhu; Jiuzhou Song
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion.

Authors:  Bradley C Livezey; Richard L Zusi
Journal:  Zool J Linn Soc       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 3.286

8.  Genome-wide analysis of short interspersed nuclear elements SINES revealed high sequence conservation, gene association and retrotranspositional activity in wheat.

Authors:  Smadar Ben-David; Beery Yaakov; Khalil Kashkush
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 6.417

9.  Waves of genomic hitchhikers shed light on the evolution of gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes).

Authors:  Jan Ole Kriegs; Andreas Matzke; Gennady Churakov; Andrej Kuritzin; Gerald Mayr; Jürgen Brosius; Jürgen Schmitz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Determining the Position of Storks on the Phylogenetic Tree of Waterbirds by Retroposon Insertion Analysis.

Authors:  Tae Kuramoto; Hidenori Nishihara; Maiko Watanabe; Norihiro Okada
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.