Literature DB >> 16368038

Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO).

Ronald Emkey1, William Koltun, Kathleen Beusterien, Larry Seidman, Alan Kivitz, Vipul Devas, Daiva Masanauskaite.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, can be administered with extended interval dosing. Patient preferences were assessed for once-monthly versus once-weekly bisphosphonate treatment using a previously developed, open-label, cross-over trial design. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a 6-month, prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center study with a two-period and two-sequence cross-over treatment design. After screening, eligible patients (postmenopausal women with osteoporosis) were randomized to once-monthly ibandronate 150 mg followed by once-weekly alendronate 70 mg for a total of 6 months (Sequence A) or once-weekly alendronate followed by once-monthly ibandronate for a total of 6 months (Sequence B). The primary objective was to evaluate patient-reported preference for either the once-monthly ibandronate regimen or the once-weekly alendronate regimen based on responses to a preference questionnaire.
RESULTS: A total of 342 patients were enrolled into this study (Sequence A, 170; Sequence B, 172). In the primary analysis of patient preference, 71.4% of women selected once-monthly ibandronate and 28.6% of women selected once-weekly alendronate. Overall, 66.1% preferred the once-monthly ibandronate regimen to the once-weekly alendronate regimen (26.5%) and 7.4% of participants stated no preference for either regimen. The preference rate for once-monthly ibandronate was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). 'Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time' was the most common reason given for patient preference for both the once-monthly ibandronate (61%, 169/276) and once-weekly alendronate (25%, 70/276) regimens. Additionally, 17% (47/276) of patients who preferred once-monthly ibandronate chose 'it is easier to tolerate side effects' as did 4.3% (12/276) of patients who preferred alendronate. Significantly more women found once-monthly ibandronate to be more convenient (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Significantly more women with postmenopausal osteoporosis preferred once-monthly ibandronate therapy to once-weekly alendronate therapy, and found the once-monthly regimen to be more convenient. Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time was the most common reason given for the patients' preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16368038     DOI: 10.1185/030079905X74862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  48 in total

1.  Efficacy of ibandronate: a long term confirmation.

Authors:  Ombretta Di Munno; Andrea Delle Sedie
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-01

2.  Adherence, preference, and satisfaction of postmenopausal women taking denosumab or alendronate.

Authors:  D L Kendler; M R McClung; N Freemantle; M Lillestol; A H Moffett; J Borenstein; S Satram-Hoang; Y-C Yang; P Kaur; D Macarios; S Siddhanti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Monthly or weekly bisphosphonate? Evaluation of satisfaction in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis using OPSAT-Q questionnaire during the BOOSTER study in Croatia.

Authors:  Tonko Vlak; Darko Kaštelan; Petar Lozo; Jure Aljinović; Marina Gradišer; Sime Mijić; Tatjana Nikolić; Blaženka Miškić; Dolores Car; Gordana Tajšić; Tina Dušek; Zrinka Jajić; Frane Grubišić; Tamara Poljičanin; Miro Bakula; Feđa Džubur; Matilda Strižak-Ujević; Mira Kadojić; Maja Radman; Maja Vugrinec; Zeljka Kuster; Marijeta Pekez; Endi Radović; Ljubica Labar; Zeljka Crnčević-Orlić; Mirko Koršić
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Changes in bone remodelling and antifracture efficacy of intermittent bisphosphonate therapy: implications from clinical studies with ibandronate.

Authors:  S E Papapoulos; R C Schimmer
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Survey of the utility of once-monthly bisphosphonate treatment for improvement of medication adherence in osteoporosis patients in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuya Makita; Hiroya Okano; Takefumi Furuya; Tomohiko Urano; Hisashi Hirabayashi; Takami Kumakubo; Jun Iwamoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  Preventing nonvertebral osteoporotic fractures with extended-interval bisphosphonates: regimen selection and clinical application.

Authors:  Raymond E Cole; Steven T Harris
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2009-01-13

Review 7.  Ibandronate: a review of its use in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Patient preference in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis with bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Reginster; Véronique Rabenda
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 9.  Optimizing dosing frequencies for bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: patient considerations.

Authors:  John Sunyecz
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Comparison of monthly ibandronate versus weekly risedronate in preference, convenience, and bone turnover markers in Korean postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

Authors:  Yoon-Sok Chung; Sung-Kil Lim; Ho-Yeon Chung; In-Kyu Lee; Il-Hyung Park; Ghi-Su Kim; Yong-Ki Min; Moo-Il Kang; Dong-Jin Chung; Yong-Ki Kim; Woong Hwan Choi; Min Ho Shong; Ji-Hyun Park; Dong-Won Byun; Hyun-Koo Yoon; Chan Soo Shin; Yil-Seob Lee; Nam-Hee Kwon
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.