Literature DB >> 16367446

Objectivism in information utilization: theory and measurement.

M R Leary1, J A Shepperd, M S McNeil, T B Jenkins, B D Barnes.   

Abstract

A self-report scale was constructed and validated that measures individual differences in objectivism--the tendency to base one's judgments and beliefs on empirical information and rational considerations. Validity data showed that, compared to people who score low on the Objectivism Scale, highly objective individuals enjoy thinking more, rely more on observable facts when making decisions, and place less emphasis on subjective and intuitive styles of decision making. Among graduate students in psychology, objectivism correlated positively with ratings of research-oriented careers, but negatively with ratings of mental health careers; also, highly objective students were more critical of nonobjective psychological assessment techniques and placed greater importance on research. Objectivism also predicted preferences for newspaper articles, college course selections, and the criteria respondents use when making decisions.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 16367446     DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Assess        ISSN: 0022-3891


  1 in total

1.  Thinking Styles and Regret in Physicians.

Authors:  Mia Djulbegovic; Jason Beckstead; Shira Elqayam; Tea Reljic; Ambuj Kumar; Charles Paidas; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.