Literature DB >> 16366817

Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: a critical review.

Elizabeth S Spelke1.   

Abstract

This article considers 3 claims that cognitive sex differences account for the differential representation of men and women in high-level careers in mathematics and science: (a) males are more focused on objects from the beginning of life and therefore are predisposed to better learning about mechanical systems; (b) males have a profile of spatial and numerical abilities producing greater aptitude for mathematics; and (c) males are more variable in their cognitive abilities and therefore predominate at the upper reaches of mathematical talent. Research on cognitive development in human infants, preschool children, and students at all levels fails to support these claims. Instead, it provides evidence that mathematical and scientific reasoning develop from a set of biologically based cognitive capacities that males and females share. These capacities lead men and women to develop equal talent for mathematics and science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16366817     DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  60 in total

1.  Can Sex Differences in Science Be Tied to the Long Reach of Prenatal Hormones? Brain Organization Theory, Digit Ratio (2D/4D), and Sex Differences in Preferences and Cognition.

Authors:  Jeffrey Valla; Stephen J Ceci
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03

2.  National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement.

Authors:  Brian A Nosek; Frederick L Smyth; N Sriram; Nicole M Lindner; Thierry Devos; Alfonso Ayala; Yoav Bar-Anan; Robin Bergh; Huajian Cai; Karen Gonsalkorale; Selin Kesebir; Norbert Maliszewski; Félix Neto; Eero Olli; Jaihyun Park; Konrad Schnabel; Kimihiro Shiomura; Bogdan Tudor Tulbure; Reinout W Wiers; Mónika Somogyi; Nazar Akrami; Bo Ekehammar; Michelangelo Vianello; Mahzarin R Banaji; Anthony G Greenwald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Development of Three-Dimensional Completion of Complex Objects.

Authors:  Kasey C Soska; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2012-05-14

Review 4.  Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions.

Authors:  Tessa E S Charlesworth; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Kindergarten children's sensitivity to geometry in maps.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Spelke; Camilla K Gilmore; Shannon McCarthy
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-03-24

6.  Sex differences in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Alice S Carter; David O Black; Sonia Tewani; Christine E Connolly; Mary Beth Kadlec; Helen Tager-Flusberg
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-01-10

7.  Trends in gender segregation in the choice of science and engineering majors.

Authors:  Allison Mann; Thomas A Diprete
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2013-07-15

Review 8.  Sex differences in the brain: the relation between structure and function.

Authors:  Geert J de Vries; Per Södersten
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy-Value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jessica Degol
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2013-12-01

10.  Sex differences and science: the etiology of science excellence.

Authors:  Claire M A Haworth; Philip S Dale; Robert Plomin
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 8.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.