Literature DB >> 16366802

Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink.

Mark R Nieuwenstein1, Marvin M Chun, Rob H J van der Lubbe, Ignace T C Hooge.   

Abstract

Observers often miss the 2nd of 2 visual targets (first target [T1] and second target [T2]) when these targets are presented closely in time; the attentional blink (AB). The authors hypothesized that the AB occurs because the attentional response to T2 is delayed by T1 processing, causing T2 to lose a competition for attention to the item that follows it. The authors investigated this hypothesis by determining whether the AB is attenuated when T2 is precued. The results from 4 experiments showed that the duration and magnitude of the AB were substantially reduced when T2 was precued. The observed improvement in T2 report did not occur at the expense of T1 report, suggesting that processing of T1 was already completed or was at least protected when the cue was presented. The authors conclude that, during the AB, there is a delay between detection and the selection of target candidates for consolidation in short-term memory. (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16366802     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  46 in total

1.  Dissociable mechanisms supporting awareness: the P300 and gamma in a linguistic attentional blink task.

Authors:  Laura Batterink; Christina M Karns; Helen Neville
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Resetting capacity limitations revealed by long-lasting elimination of attentional blink through training.

Authors:  Hoon Choi; Li-Hung Chang; Kazuhisa Shibata; Yuka Sasaki; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rapid switching and complementary evidence accumulation enable flexibility of an all-or-none global workspace for control of attentional and conscious processing: a reply to Wyble et al.

Authors:  Antonino Raffone; Narayanan Srinivasan; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Stefan van der Stigchel; Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-08

5.  On the failure of distractor inhibition in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; Irina M Harris
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

6.  Attentional blinks as errors in temporal binding.

Authors:  Ariella V Popple; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Temporal selection is suppressed, delayed, and diffused during the attentional blink.

Authors:  Edward Vul; Mark Nieuwenstein; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-01

8.  How to keep attention from straying: get engaged!

Authors:  Charles L Folk; Edward F Ester; Kristof Troemel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

9.  Whole Report versus Partial Report in RSVP Sentences.

Authors:  Mary C Potter; Mark Nieuwenstein; Nina Strohminger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Unmasking the attentional blink.

Authors:  Mark R Nieuwenstein; Mary C Potter; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.