Literature DB >> 16365685

Disease activity and functional changes of RA patients receiving different DMARDs in clinical practice.

Manathip Osiri1, Utis Deesomchok, Peter Tugwell.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in improving disease activity and functional status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). One hundred and fifty-two Thai RA patients treated with at least one DMARD were enrolled in this 1-year cohort. Demographic characteristics, baseline and end-of-study data on disease activity and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index of the subjects were compared among different DMARD options. Predictors of HAQ score were investigated using regression analysis. The results showed that the studied patients had established RA with mild to moderate activity. More than 85% were prescribed methotrexate (MTX) as single or combined DMARDs. At 1 year, improvement in most activity measures was experienced. However, all patients had functional declines. Patients taking antimalarial agents had the maximal rate of functional deterioration. Patients taking MTX-based DMARDs had significantly lower rate of functional decline than patients taking DMARDs without MTX (p=0.018). Only patients receiving MTX-based DMARDs had clinically meaningful improvement in HAQ score. The predictors of HAQ score at 1 year included baseline HAQ score and patient global assessment at end of study. In conclusion, although DMARD treatment was shown to improve disease activity in RA patients, functional deterioration was evident in our cohort. Thus, measures of functional status are more appropriate than measures of disease activity to evaluate treatment effects of DMARDs in established RA in clinical practice. MTX-based DMARDs should be prescribed where possible in RA patients with persisting activity due to their ability to delay functional deterioration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16365685     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-005-0155-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  39 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 Update.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-02

2.  American College of Rheumatology criteria for improvement in rheumatoid arthritis should only be calculated from scores that decrease on improvement.

Authors:  M Boers; A C Verhoeven; S van der Linden
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-05

3.  Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Boers; A C Verhoeven; H M Markusse; M A van de Laar; R Westhovens; J C van Denderen; D van Zeben; B A Dijkmans; A J Peeters; P Jacobs; H R van den Brink; H J Schouten; D M van der Heijde; A Boonen; S van der Linden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-08-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Ten year outcome in a cohort of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: health status, disease process, and damage.

Authors:  E Lindqvist; T Saxne; P Geborek; K Eberhardt
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Auranofin improves outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis. Results from a 2-year, double blind placebo controlled study.

Authors:  G Borg; E Allander; B Lund; E Berg; U Brodin; H Pettersson; L Trang
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Long-term outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: a simple algorithm of baseline parameters can predict radiographic damage, disability, and disease course at 12-year followup.

Authors:  K W Drossaers-Bakker; A H Zwinderman; T P M Vliet Vlieland; D Van Zeben; K Vos; F C Breedveld; J M W Hazes
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-08

7.  Factors predicting outcome of rheumatoid arthritis: results of a followup study.

Authors:  D van Zeben; J M Hazes; A H Zwinderman; J P Vandenbroucke; F C Breedveld
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Outcome in rheumatoid arthritis. A 1985 inception cohort study.

Authors:  M E Suarez-Almazor; C L Soskolne; L D Saunders; A S Russell
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Should improvement in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials be defined as fifty percent or seventy percent improvement in core set measures, rather than twenty percent?

Authors:  D T Felson; J J Anderson; M L Lange; G Wells; M P LaValley
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-09

Review 10.  Quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis : which drugs might make a difference?

Authors:  Barbara Blumenauer; Ann Cranney; Jennifer Clinch; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  1 in total

1.  In Situ Forming Injectable Hydrogel For Encapsulation Of Nanoiguratimod And Sustained Release Of Therapeutics.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Ma; Cheng Tao; Lin Sun; Shengbei Qi; Yuan Le; Jiexin Wang; Changhong Li; Xiangyuan Liu; Jianjun Zhang; Jinxia Zhao
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-11-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.