Literature DB >> 16365615

Gender differences in stroke care decision-making.

Moira K Kapral1, Jennifer Devon, Anne-Luise Winter, Julie Wang, Anne Peters, Susan J Bondy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women are less likely than men to receive some stroke care interventions. It is not known whether gender differences in patient preferences explain some of the observed variations in stroke care delivery.
METHODS: Outpatients with and without a history of cerebrovascular disease were recruited from stroke, vascular, and general internal medicine ambulatory clinics between September 2002 and October 2003. Self-administered surveys described hypothetical scenarios, and participants were asked if they would accept therapy with thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke or carotid endarterectomy for secondary stroke prevention. The surveys also included questions on sociodemographic factors and decision-making preferences.
RESULTS: A total of 586 patients (45% women) completed the survey. Women were less likely than men to accept thrombolysis (79% vs. 86%, P=0.014), even after adjustment for other factors (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.92). Women and men were equally likely to accept carotid endarterectomy (82% vs. 84%, P=0.502), even after adjustment for other factors (adjusted OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.58- 1.53). Women were less confident in their decisions, were more risk averse, and would have preferred more information to assist them in their decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS: No gender differences were found in patient preferences for carotid surgery. However, we observed gender differences in patient preferences for thrombolysis and in general attitudes toward stroke care decision-making. Health care providers should be aware that, compared with men, women may be more concerned about risks and may require more information before they make a decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16365615     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000188911.83349.a8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  14 in total

Review 1.  Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Samantha MacLean; Sohail Mulla; Elie A Akl; Milosz Jankowski; Per Olav Vandvik; Shanil Ebrahim; Shelley McLeod; Neera Bhatnagar; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Inability to consent does not diminish the desirability of stroke thrombolysis.

Authors:  Winston Chiong; Anthony S Kim; Ivy A Huang; Nita A Farahany; S Andrew Josephson
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Gender differences in treatment of severe carotid stenosis after transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Sharon N Poisson; S Claiborne Johnston; Stephen Sidney; Jeffrey G Klingman; Mai N Nguyen-Huynh
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Sex differences in antiplatelet response in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Dawn M Meyer; Jo-Ann Eastwood; Margaret P Compton; Karen Gylys; Justin A Zivin; Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2011-07

5.  Sex Disparities in Ischemic Stroke Care: FL-PR CReSD Study (Florida-Puerto Rico Collaboration to Reduce Stroke Disparities).

Authors:  Negar Asdaghi; Jose G Romano; Kefeng Wang; Maria A Ciliberti-Vargas; Sebastian Koch; Hannah Gardener; Chuanhui Dong; David Z Rose; Salina P Waddy; Mary Robichaux; Enid J Garcia; Juan A Gonzalez-Sanchez; W Scott Burgin; Ralph L Sacco; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Sex differences in stroke: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Cheryl D Bushnell; Seemant Chaturvedi; Kathy R Gage; Paco S Herson; Patricia D Hurn; Monik C Jiménez; Steven J Kittner; Tracy E Madsen; Louise D McCullough; Mollie McDermott; Mathew J Reeves; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Do sex differences exist in patient preferences for cardiovascular testing?

Authors:  Stacie L Daugherty; David J Magid
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Race-Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Declination of Thrombolysis for Stroke.

Authors:  Scott J Mendelson; Shuaiqi Zhang; Roland Matsouaka; Ying Xian; Shreyansh Shah; Barbara L Lytle; Nicole Solomon; Lee H Schwamm; Eric E Smith; Jeffrey L Saver; Gregg Fonarow; Jane Holl; Shyam Prabhakaran
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  [Gender aspects of Ischemic stroke. An analysis of the Austrian Stroke-Unit Registry].

Authors:  Susanna Horner; Kurt Niederkorn; Stefan Schnabl; Franz Fazekas
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

10.  Factors Mediating Outcome After Stroke: Gender, Thrombolysis, and Their Interaction.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Lee; Sung Hyuk Heo; Walter T Ambrosius; Cheryl D Bushnell
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.829

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.