Literature DB >> 16364686

Cortical activation with deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamus for epilepsy.

Dominik Zumsteg1, Andres M Lozano, Heinz Gregor Wieser, Richard A Wennberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We studied the relation between thalamic stimulation parameters and the morphology, topographic distribution and cortical sources of the cerebral responses in patients with intractable epilepsy undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus.
METHODS: Bipolar and monopolar stimuli were delivered at a rate of 2 Hz to the anterior (AN, four patients), the dorsomedian (DM, four patients), and the centromedian nucleus (CM, one patient) using the programmable stimulation device (Medtronic ITREL II). Source modeling was carried out by using statistical non-parametric mapping of low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) values.
RESULTS: All patients demonstrated reproducible time-locked cortical responses (CRs) consisting of a sequence of components with latencies between 20 and 320 ms. The morphology of these CRs, however, was very heterogeneous, depending primarily on the site of stimulation. Following AN stimulation, cortical activation was most prominent in ipsilateral cingulate gyrus, insular cortex and lateral neocortical temporal structures. Stimulation of the DM mainly showed activation of the ipsilateral orbitofrontal and mesial and lateral frontal areas, but also involvement of mesial temporal structures. Stimulation of the CM showed a rather diffuse (though still mainly ipsilateral) increase of cortical activity. The magnitude of cortical activation was positively related to the strength of the stimulus and inversely related to the impedance of the electrode.
CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of cortical activation corresponded with the hodology of the involved structures and may underscore the importance of optimal localization of DBS electrodes in patients with epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: The method of analyzing sources of CRs could potentially be a useful tool for titration of DBS parameters in patients with electrode contacts in clinically silent areas. Furthermore, the inverse relation of the cortical activation and the impedance of the electrode contacts might suggest that these impedance measurements should be taken into consideration when adjusting DBS parameters in patients with epilepsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16364686     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  31 in total

Review 1.  Network effects of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ahmad Alhourani; Michael M McDowell; Michael J Randazzo; Thomas A Wozny; Efstathios D Kondylis; Witold J Lipski; Sarah Beck; Jordan F Karp; Avniel S Ghuman; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Epilepsy: Biomarkers for Optimization.

Authors:  Katrina L Dell; Mark J Cook; Matias I Maturana
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Treating epilepsy via adaptive neurostimulation: a reinforcement learning approach.

Authors:  Joelle Pineau; Arthur Guez; Robert Vincent; Gabriella Panuccio; Massimo Avoli
Journal:  Int J Neural Syst       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.866

4.  Clocking the social mind by identifying mental processes in the IAT with electrical neuroimaging.

Authors:  Bastian Schiller; Lorena R R Gianotti; Thomas Baumgartner; Kyle Nash; Thomas Koenig; Daria Knoch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cortical hypoactivation during resting EEG suggests central nervous system pathology in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  M A Zinn; M L Zinn; I Valencia; L A Jason; J G Montoya
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Anterior Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation: Functional Activation Patterns in a Large Animal Model.

Authors:  William S Gibson; Erika K Ross; Seong Rok Han; Jamie J Van Gompel; Hoon-Ki Min; Kendall H Lee
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Thalamic interictal epileptiform discharges in deep brain stimulated epilepsy patients.

Authors:  Catherine M Sweeney-Reed; Harim Lee; Stefan Rampp; Tino Zaehle; Lars Buentjen; Juergen Voges; Martin Holtkamp; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Friedhelm C Schmitt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Test-retest reliability of a stimulation-locked evoked response to deep brain stimulation in subcallosal cingulate for treatment resistant depression.

Authors:  Allison C Waters; Ashan Veerakumar; Ki Sueng Choi; Bryan Howell; Vineet Tiruvadi; Kelly R Bijanki; Andrea Crowell; Patricio Riva-Posse; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  The differences in brain activity between narrow band noise and pure tone tinnitus.

Authors:  Sven Vanneste; Mark Plazier; Elsa van der Loo; Paul Van de Heyning; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Studying network mechanisms using intracranial stimulation in epileptic patients.

Authors:  Olivier David; Julien Bastin; Stéphan Chabardès; Lorella Minotti; Philippe Kahane
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.