Literature DB >> 16363755

Sexual functioning after vaginal hysterectomy or transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension for uterine prolapse: a comparison.

Cherng-Jye Jeng1, Yuh-Cheng Yang, Chii-Ruey Tzeng, Jenta Shen, Lih-Rong Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in sexuality after total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) or transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension (SSUS)for uterine prolapse. STUDY
DESIGN: One hundred fifty-eight women with moderate to severe uterine prolapse undergoing TVH (78) or SSUS (80) were included in a prospective study from January 2001 to June 2002. All women were <50 years old and sexually active within the last 6 months before surgical intervention. None had major medical disorders. Sexual functioning before and 6 months after surgery was examined via a face-to-face questionnaire. Sexual interest, sexual satisfaction, frequency of sexual intercourse and frequency of orgasm were measured using an analogue scale.
RESULTS: Of women undergoing TVH, 5.1% had decreased sexual interest, and 21% had less frequent orgasms postoperatively. For women undergoing SSUS, 13% had decreased sexual interest, and 20% had less frequent orgasms postoperatively. Frequency of orgasm was the only parameter that changed significantly after surgery in the 2 groups. All women with less frequent orgasms said that they were afraid of wound disruption or disease recurrence and so refrained from vigorous or exciting sexual intercourse. About four-fifths of the women in both groups accepted or were satisfied with their sexuality after surgery. For women undergoing TVH, 2.6% had increased frequency of orgasm, and 5% had better overall sexual satisfaction postoperatively. For women undergoing SSUS, 10% had increased sexual satisfaction postoperatively. There was a 2.5% and 2.6% increase in postoperative sexual interest in the SSUS and TVH groups, respectively. The sexual functioning scores were not different before or after surgical intervention in either group.
CONCLUSION: There is a decrease in thefrequency of orgasm after both TVH and SSUS. However, there is no significant difference in postoperative sexual functioning between women with and without preservation of the uterus in correcting uterine prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16363755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  26 in total

1.  [Vaginal descensus and prolapse. Which operative technique?].

Authors:  M F Hamann; C Seif
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; C Huub van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 3.  Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation.

Authors:  Nathan Kow; Howard B Goldman; Beri Ridgeway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  [Prolapse surgery: vaginal mesh or sacropexy].

Authors:  M F Hamann; R M Bauer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review.

Authors:  Christopher M Maher; Benny Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Cathryn M A Glazener
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Ethan M Balk; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sofia Andrade de Oliveira; Marcelo C M Fonseca; Maria A T Bortolini; Manoel J B C Girão; Matheus T Roque; Rodrigo A Castro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Shveta Kapoor; Kanapathippillai Sivanesan; Jessica Amy Robertson; Mayooran Veerasingham; Vishal Kapoor
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Carl H van der Vaart; Yolanda van der Graaf; Peter Heintz; Steven E Schraffordt Koops
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.