Literature DB >> 16362270

Lowering the thyroid dose in screening examinations of the cervical spine.

Kirstin M Shu1, John D MacKenzie, Jesse B Smith, Elise M Blinder, Lisa M Bourgeois, Stephen Ledbetter, Frank P Castronovo, Philip F Judy, Frank Rybicki.   

Abstract

The first objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that a lower-dose (14.1 mGy thyroid dose) protocol for helical computed tomography (CT) of the entire cervical spine demonstrates equivalent technical adequacy and diagnostic accuracy as the standard-dose protocol (26.0 mGy thyroid dose) used at our institution. The second objective was to estimate the excess thyroid cancer mortality for three cervical spine screening protocols. Eight patients underwent two helical CT acquisitions of the entire cervical spine (standard and lower dose); from these acquisitions, a database of 128 randomized images (64 standard dose and 64 lower dose) was constructed. Three radiologists evaluated each of the 128 images for technical adequacy and, if the image was technically adequate, diagnostic accuracy. Historical data of excess thyroid cancer mortality stratified by age and sex were used to estimate the impact of lowering the thyroid dose in cervical spine screening. Estimates used a linear extrapolation of mortality data. The lower-dose protocol for helical CT of the entire cervical spine demonstrates equivalent technical adequacy and diagnostic accuracy as the standard protocol. The excess thyroid cancer mortality is a function of patient age and sex; for 25-year-old men, the excess mortality per 100,000 patients is 96.7 (standard-dose CT), 52.4 (lower-dose CT), and 6.7 (radiographs alone, 1.8 mGy thyroid dose). The equivalent technical adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of a lower-dose protocol for helical CT of the entire cervical spine support its implementation in routine screening. The excess thyroid mortality emphasizes the need to maintain an open dialogue with our referring clinicians with respect to the mechanism of injury, clinical findings, and radiation risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16362270     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-005-0462-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  12 in total

1.  Cervical spine injury: a clinical decision rule to identify high-risk patients for helical CT screening.

Authors:  J A Hanson; C C Blackmore; F A Mann; A J Wilson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The role of helical CT in the assessment of cervical spine injuries.

Authors:  D B Nuñez; R M Quencer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Simulated dose reduction in conventional chest CT: validation study.

Authors:  J R Mayo; K P Whittall; A N Leung; T E Hartman; C S Park; S L Primack; G K Chambers; M K Limkeman; T L Toth; S H Fox
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Radiology of the cervical spine in trauma patients: practice pitfalls and recommendations for improving efficiency and communication.

Authors:  R M Vandemark
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  C C Blackmore; S D Ramsey; F A Mann; R A Deyo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Adequacy of plain radiography in the diagnosis of cervical spine injuries.

Authors:  Giang K Nguyen; Robert Clark
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-04

7.  Cervical spine trauma: how much more do we learn by routinely using helical CT?

Authors:  D B Nuñez; A Zuluaga; D A Fuentes-Bernardo; L A Rivas; J L Becerra
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Skin and thyroid dosimetry in cervical spine screening: two methods for evaluation and a comparison between a helical CT and radiographic trauma series.

Authors:  Frank Rybicki; Richard D Nawfel; Philip F Judy; Stephen Ledbetter; Rebecca L Dyson; Peter S Halt; Kirstin M Shu; Diego B Nuñez
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality.

Authors:  Srinivasa R Prasad; Conrad Wittram; Jo-Anne Shepard; Theresa McLoud; James Rhea
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Thyroid abnormalities after therapeutic external radiation.

Authors:  S L Hancock; I R McDougall; L S Constine
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-03-30       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evidence for prospective ECG-triggering coronary CT angiography in routine practice.

Authors:  Ali Salavati; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Inadvertent thyroid irradiation in protocol-driven trauma CT: a survey of hospital ERs.

Authors:  Stephen R Baker; Yih-Hann H Hsieh; Pierre D Maldjian; Michael T Scanlan
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-01-09

Review 3.  CT angiography for surgical planning in face transplantation candidates.

Authors:  S Soga; B Pomahac; N Wake; K Schultz; R F Prior; K Kumamaru; M L Steigner; D Mitsouras; J Signorelli; E M Bueno; D S Enterline; F J Rybicki
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Cost-effective diagnostic cardiovascular imaging: when does it provide good value for the money?

Authors:  Hansel J Otero; Frank J Rybicki; Dan Greenberg; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Jorge A Mendoza; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Michael L Steigner; Hansel J Otero; Tianxi Cai; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Leelakrishna Nallamshetty; Amanda G Whitmore; Hale Ersoy; Noah A Levit; Marcelo F Di Carli; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Frank J Rybicki; Hansel J Otero; Michael L Steigner; Gabriel Vorobiof; Leelakrishna Nallamshetty; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Hale Ersoy; Richard T Mather; Philip F Judy; Tianxi Cai; Karl Coyner; Kurt Schultz; Amanda G Whitmore; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Noninvasive vascular images for face transplant surgical planning.

Authors:  Shigeyoshi Soga; Nicole Wake; Ericka M Bueno; Michael L Steigner; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Kurt Schultz; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Geoffroy C Sisk; Richard Prior; Sara L Powers; Jason Signorelli; Camille K Jania; Bohdan Pomahac; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-12-14

8.  Cine computed tomography angiography evaluation of blood flow for full face transplant surgical planning.

Authors:  Geoffroy C Sisk; Kanako K Kumamaru; Kurt Schultz; Ericka M Bueno; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Elizabeth George; Marta M Redjaee; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Michael L Steigner; Bohdan Pomahac; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-12-18

9.  Reduced radiation exposure for face transplant surgical planning computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Kurt Schultz; Elizabeth George; Katherine M Mullen; Michael L Steigner; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Ericka M Bueno; Bohdan Pomahac; Frank J Rybicki; Kanako K Kumamaru
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Simulated 50 % radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D).

Authors:  Marcus Y Chen; Michael L Steigner; Steve W Leung; Kanako K Kumamaru; Kurt Schultz; Richard T Mather; Andrew E Arai; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.357

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.