PURPOSE: To identify recurrent regions of genomic gain or loss in chondrosarcoma in a clinically relevant and statistically valid fashion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) results of 15 frozen tumor samples of high-grade chondrosarcoma for chromosome 8 are presented. A separate subset of 116 cartilaginous tumors with outcome data was used for validation. RESULTS: Array CGH identified gain at 8q24.12-q24.13, the region of the MYC (c-Myc) oncogene, as a frequent change in high-grade chondrosarcoma. In the validation arm of 116 cartilaginous tumors, MYC was frequently amplified in G2 (15%), G3 (20%), and dedifferentiated (21%) chondrosarcomas. No amplification was identified in samples of enchondroma and grade 1 chondrosarcoma. In samples without MYC amplification, polysomy 8 was a frequent finding in grade 1 (18%), grade 2 (31%), grade 3 (80%), and dedifferentiated (29%) chondrosarcomas, but was not found in any samples of enchondroma. MYC protein expression was identified in all samples with amplification, but was also frequent in the remaining samples without amplification or polysomy 8. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall survival showed a statistically significant difference for patients with MYC amplification or polysomy 8 (P = .034). Univariate analysis involving Cox proportional hazards models showed that grade (P = .003), polysomy 8 (P = .045), and MYC amplification (P = .053) correlated with shorter overall survival. By multivariate analysis, grade of chondrosarcoma (P = .026) was the only factor to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: MYC amplification and polysomy 8 can be used as markers of prognostic importance in chondrosarcoma. Molecular targeting of MYC expression may have therapeutic potential in the future for subsets of chondrosarcoma.
PURPOSE: To identify recurrent regions of genomic gain or loss in chondrosarcoma in a clinically relevant and statistically valid fashion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) results of 15 frozen tumor samples of high-grade chondrosarcoma for chromosome 8 are presented. A separate subset of 116 cartilaginous tumors with outcome data was used for validation. RESULTS: Array CGH identified gain at 8q24.12-q24.13, the region of the MYC (c-Myc) oncogene, as a frequent change in high-grade chondrosarcoma. In the validation arm of 116 cartilaginous tumors, MYC was frequently amplified in G2 (15%), G3 (20%), and dedifferentiated (21%) chondrosarcomas. No amplification was identified in samples of enchondroma and grade 1 chondrosarcoma. In samples without MYC amplification, polysomy 8 was a frequent finding in grade 1 (18%), grade 2 (31%), grade 3 (80%), and dedifferentiated (29%) chondrosarcomas, but was not found in any samples of enchondroma. MYC protein expression was identified in all samples with amplification, but was also frequent in the remaining samples without amplification or polysomy 8. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall survival showed a statistically significant difference for patients with MYC amplification or polysomy 8 (P = .034). Univariate analysis involving Cox proportional hazards models showed that grade (P = .003), polysomy 8 (P = .045), and MYC amplification (P = .053) correlated with shorter overall survival. By multivariate analysis, grade of chondrosarcoma (P = .026) was the only factor to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION:MYC amplification and polysomy 8 can be used as markers of prognostic importance in chondrosarcoma. Molecular targeting of MYC expression may have therapeutic potential in the future for subsets of chondrosarcoma.
Authors: Pablo Ortega; David Suster; Giovanni Falconieri; Eduardo Zambrano; Cesar A Moran; Carl Morrison; Saul Suster Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Ning Lu; Tao Lin; Lin Wang; Mei Qi; Zhiyan Liu; Hongyan Dong; Xiying Zhang; Chunyan Zhai; Yan Wang; Long Liu; Lei Xiang; Lei Qi; Bo Han; Jinsong Li Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2015-01-09
Authors: Johanna Manner; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Peter Hohenberger; Katharina Mössinger; Stefan Küffer; Christian Sauer; Djeda Belharazem; Andreas Zettl; Jean-Michel Coindre; Christian Hallermann; Jörg Thomas Hartmann; Detlef Katenkamp; Kathrin Katenkamp; Patrick Schöffski; Raf Sciot; Agnieszka Wozniak; Peter Lichter; Alexander Marx; Philipp Ströbel Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Kristine M Cornejo; Lloyd Hutchinson; Maryann St Cyr; Vania Nose; Patrick J McLaughlin; A John Iafrate; Peter M Sadow Journal: Endocr Pathol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.943
Authors: Mauting Lin; Carl D Morrison; Susie Jones; Nehad Mohamed; Jason Bacher; Christoph Plass Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-08-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Kathleen M Darcy; William E Brady; Jan K Blancato; Robert B Dickson; William J Hoskins; William P McGuire; Michael J Birrer Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 5.482