Literature DB >> 16361550

Inclusion of vasculature-related variables in the Dukes staging system of colon cancer.

Michael I Koukourakis1, Alexandra Giatromanolaki, Efthimios Sivridis, Kevin C Gatter, Adrian L Harris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Dukes stage is used to stratify colorectal cancer patients into groups of different prognosis and need of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, approximately 80% of patients with Dukes stage C colorectal cancer receive cytotoxic therapy without any expected benefit, for such patients would either not relapse without adjuvant therapy or they would inevitably do so because of tumor resistance to the available regimens. On the other hand, as 20% of Dukes stage B patients would relapse after surgery, adjuvant therapy could improve their survival. Improvement of the Dukes stage predictive accuracy is necessary to better assign patients for adjuvant therapies, especially nowadays when antiangiogenic agents are being incorporated in the clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, we examined the prognostic role of Dukes staging system in parallel with three vasculature-related variables (vascular invasion, tumor angiogenic activity, and vascular survival ability) in a series of 130 stage B/C patients with colorectal cancer treated with surgery alone (without adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy).
RESULTS: Inclusion of vasculature-related variables in the Dukes staging system significantly improved the prognostic categorization of patients, identifying subgroups of B-stage and C-stage patients with an up to 40% and 60% 5-year survival difference, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results show that the prognostic value of Dukes staging system is significantly improved after taking into account vasculature-related variables, which may be useful in stratifying patients for adjuvant therapies, highlighting also subgroups that may benefit the most from antiangiogenic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16361550     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of factors associated with prognosis after colorectal cancer resection in 174 Chinese elderly patients.

Authors:  Zheng Jiang; Chunxiang Li; Xiaohui Qiu; Ye Xu; Xishan Wang; Sanjun Cai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The Factors Effecting Lymphovascular Invasion in Adenocarcinoma of the Colon and Rectum.

Authors:  Ali Aktekin; Selvinaz Özkara; Günay Gürleyik; Mehmet Odabaşi; Tolga Müftüoğlu; Abdullah Sağlam
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chang-Zheng Du; Wei-Cheng Xue; Yong Cai; Ming Li; Jin Gu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Clinicopathological significance of stromal variables: angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, inflammatory infiltration, MMP and PINCH in colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Sun; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 27.401

5.  A two-gene blood test for methylated DNA sensitive for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Susanne K Pedersen; Rohan T Baker; Aidan McEvoy; David H Murray; Melissa Thomas; Peter L Molloy; Sue Mitchell; Trevor Lockett; Graeme P Young; Lawrence C LaPointe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Combination of letrozole, metronomic cyclophosphamide and sorafenib is well-tolerated and shows activity in patients with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  L Bazzola; C Foroni; D Andreis; V Zanoni; M R Cappelletti; G Allevi; S Aguggini; C Strina; M Milani; S Venturini; F Ferrozzi; R Giardini; R Bertoni; H Turley; K Gatter; P G Petronini; S B Fox; A L Harris; M Martinotti; A Berruti; A Bottini; A R Reynolds; D Generali
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Prognostic Factors in Terms of the Number of Metastatic Nodules in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Ki Ung Jang; Chan Wook Kim; Ki-Hun Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Chang Sik Yu; Tae Won Kim; Pyo Nyun Kim; Jong Hoon Kim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2016-06-30

8.  A Novel Multimodal Radiomics Model for Preoperative Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yiying Zhang; Kan He; Yan Guo; Xiangchun Liu; Qi Yang; Chunyu Zhang; Yunming Xie; Shengnan Mu; Yu Guo; Yu Fu; Huimao Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Vascular density analysis in colorectal cancer patients treated with vatalanib (PTK787/ZK222584) in the randomised CONFIRM trials.

Authors:  A Giatromanolaki; M I Koukourakis; E Sivridis; K C Gatter; T Trarbach; G Folprecht; M M Shi; D Lebwohl; T Jalava; D Laurent; G Meinhardt; A L Harris
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Hai Huang; Xiu-Wu Pan; Dan-Feng Xu; Xin-Gang Cui; Jie Chen; Yi Hong; Yi Gao; Lei Yin; Jian-Qing Ye; Lin Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.