Literature DB >> 16361511

Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis.

H W Gonyou1, M C Brumm, E Bush, J Deen, S A Edwards, T Fangman, J J McGlone, M Meunier-Salaun, R B Morrison, H Spoolder, P L Sundberg, A K Johnson.   

Abstract

Few issues in swine production are as complex as floor space allowances. One method for pork producers to calculate floor space allowance (A) is to convert BW into a 2-dimensional concept yielding an expression of A = k * BW(0.667). Data on ADG, ADFI, and G:F were obtained from published peer-reviewed studies. Five data sets were created: A = grower-finisher pigs, fully slatted floors, and consistent group size; B = grower-finisher pigs and fully slatted floors (group size did not need to be consistent); C = grower-finisher pigs, partially slatted floors, and consistent group size; D = grower-finisher pigs, partially slatted floors (group size did not need to be consistent); and E = nursery pigs, fully slatted or woven wire floors (group size did not need to be consistent). Each data set was analyzed using a broken-line analysis and a linear regression. For the broken-line analyses, the critical k value, below which a decrease in ADG occurred, varied from 0.0317 to 0.0348. In all cases the effect of space allowance on ADG was significant (P < 0.05). Using the linear analyses based on data with k values of < 0.030, the critical k values for the 4 grower-finisher data sets did not differ from those obtained using the broken-line analysis (0.0358 vs. 0.0336, respectively; P > 0.10); however, none of the linear regressions explained a significant proportion of the variation in ADG. The slopes for the nonplateau portion of the broken-line analyses based on percent values varied among data sets. For every 0.001 decrease in k (approximately 3% of the critical k value), ADG decreased by 0.56 to 1.41%, with an average value of 0.98% for the 5%-based analyses. The use of an allometric approach to express space allowance and broken-line analysis to establish space requirements seem to be useful tools for pig production. The critical k value at which crowding becomes detrimental to the growth of the pig is similar in full- and partial-slat systems and in nursery and grower-finisher stages. The critical point for crowding determined in these analyses approximated current recommendations to ensure the welfare of pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16361511     DOI: 10.2527/2006.841229x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  19 in total

1.  Effect of floor space allowances on growth performance of finishing pigs marketed at 138 kilograms.

Authors:  L J Johnston; D W Rozeboom; R D Goodband; S J Moeller; M C Shannon; S J Schieck
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Invited review: strategic adoption of antibiotic-free pork production: the importance of a holistic approach.

Authors:  John F Patience; Alejandro Ramirez
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Effects of reducing the standardized ileal digestible lysine and tryptophan to lysine ratio to slow growth of finishing pigs.

Authors:  Andres F Tolosa; Mike D Tokach; Robert D Goodband; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey; Jordan T Gebhardt; Matt L Wolfe
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Minimal floor space allowance for gestating sows kept in pens with electronic sow feeders on fully slatted floors.

Authors:  Yuzhi Z Li; Shiquan Q Cui; Xiaojian J Yang; Lee J Johnston; Samuel K Baidoo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effects of increasing space allowance by removing a pig or gate adjustment on finishing pig growth performance.

Authors:  Corey B Carpenter; Cheyenne J Holder; Fangzhou Wu; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey; Mike D Tokach; Robert D Goodband; Steve S Dritz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  The Effect of Steps to Promote Higher Levels of Farm Animal Welfare across the EU. Societal versus Animal Scientists' Perceptions of Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Xavier Averós; Miguel A Aparicio; Paolo Ferrari; Jonathan H Guy; Carmen Hubbard; Otto Schmid; Vlatko Ilieski; Hans A M Spoolder
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Daily feed intake, energy intake, growth rate and measures of dietary energy efficiency of pigs from four sire lines fed diets with high or low metabolizable and net energy concentrations.

Authors:  A P Schinckel; M E Einstein; S Jungst; J O Matthews; C Booher; T Dreadin; C Fralick; E Wilson; R D Boyd
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Density-Dependent Spacing Behaviour and Activity Budget in Pregnant, Domestic Goats (Capra hircus).

Authors:  Judit Vas; Inger Lise Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Space availability in confined sheep during pregnancy, effects in movement patterns and use of space.

Authors:  Xavier Averós; Areta Lorea; Ignacia Beltrán de Heredia; Josune Arranz; Roberto Ruiz; Inma Estevez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of Floor Space Allowance on Pig Productivity across Stages of Growth: A Field-scale Analysis.

Authors:  Joon H Lee; Hong L Choi; Yong J Heo; Yoon P Chung
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.