Literature DB >> 35663616

Effects of reducing the standardized ileal digestible lysine and tryptophan to lysine ratio to slow growth of finishing pigs.

Andres F Tolosa1, Mike D Tokach1, Robert D Goodband1, Jason C Woodworth1, Joel M DeRouchey1, Jordan T Gebhardt2, Matt L Wolfe3.   

Abstract

The COVID-19 global pandemic greatly affected pork processing plants in the United States. These pork processing plants were forced to either temporarily close or operate at reduced capacity due to the increased number of health-related employee absences. Because finishing pigs could not be timely marketed, methods to reduce growth performance were required to keep pigs from becoming too heavy at slaughter weight. Therefore, our objective was to determine the extent that reducing dietary standardized ileal digestible (SID) Lys and tryptophan-to-lysine ratio (Trp:Lys) ratio would slow finishing pig average daily gain (ADG) in a commercial setting. A total of 1,080 finishing pigs (327 × 1050, PIC; initially 32.3 kg) were used in a 119-d growth trial. Pigs were allotted by initial body weight (BW) and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 dietary treatments in a completely randomized block design with 27 pigs per pen and 10 pens per treatment. Three dietary regimes were formulated to contain either 100%, 90%, or 80% of the estimated SID Lys requirement for pigs in this facility, with a SID Trp:Lys ratio of 19%, with the exception of the last dietary phase formulated to 17% SID Trp:Lys. Seven different dietary phases were fed. The SID Lys concentrations in the 100% diets were: 1.10%, 1.01%, 0.91%, 0.83%, 0.79%, 0.71%, or 0.67% SID Lys from 32 to 40, 40 to 51, 51 to 72, 72 to 85, 85 to 98, 98 to 112, and 112 to 130 kg, respectively. A fourth regime was formulated to 80% SID Lys with a SID Trp:Lys ratio of 16% (80-16% SID Trp:Lys) throughout all phases. Overall from d 0 to 119, ADG (linear, P < 0.001), final BW (linear, P < 0.001), and gain-to-feed (G:F) decreased (linear, P = 0.087) as SID Lys decreased from 100% to 80% of the estimated requirement. Pigs fed the 80-16% SID Trp:Lys diets had an additional decrease in ADG (P < 0.05) and G:F (P < 0.10) compared with pigs fed 80% of the SID Lys requirement with the normal Trp:Lys ratio. The reduction in SID Lys (from 100% to 80%) and reduction in SID Lys and Trp:Lys ratio resulted in an 8.6 and 11.7 kg, respectively, decrease in final BW compared with pigs fed Lys and Trp at the requirement (100%). This study provides alternatives for pork producers to reduce growth rate of finishing pigs. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  grow-finish pigs; lysine; slow down growth; tryptophan

Year:  2022        PMID: 35663616      PMCID: PMC9155617          DOI: 10.1093/tas/txac057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Anim Sci        ISSN: 2573-2102


  13 in total

1.  Optimal dietary standardized ileal digestible lysine and crude protein concentration for growth and carcass performance in finishing pigs weighing greater than 100 kg1,2.

Authors:  Jose A Soto; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey; Robert D Goodband; Fangzhou Wu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Dose-response evaluation of the standardized ileal digestible tryptophan : lysine ratio to maximize growth performance of growing-finishing gilts under commercial conditions.

Authors:  M A D Gonçalves; M D Tokach; N M Bello; K J Touchette; R D Goodband; J M DeRouchey; J C Woodworth; S S Dritz
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Meta-regression analysis to predict the influence of branched-chain and large neutral amino acids on growth performance of pigs1.

Authors:  Henrique S Cemin; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey; Robert D Goodband
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Evaluation of increased fiber, decreased amino acids, or decreased electrolyte balance as dietary approaches to slow finishing pig growth rates.

Authors:  Emma T Helm; John F Patience; Matthew R Romoser; Colin D Johnson; Jason W Ross; Nicholas K Gabler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  How two concurrent pandemics put a spoke in the wheel of intensive pig production.

Authors:  Sam Millet; Sarah De Smet; Egbert F Knol; Giuseppe Bee; Paolo Trevisi; Stafford Vigors; Katja Nilsson; Jef Van Meensel
Journal:  Anim Front       Date:  2021-02-05

6.  A descriptive analysis of the COVID-19 impacts on U.S. pork, turkey, and egg markets.

Authors:  Dermot J Hayes; Lee L Schulz; Chad E Hart; Keri L Jacobs
Journal:  Agribusiness (N Y N Y)       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Slowing pig growth during COVID-19, models for use in future market fluctuations.

Authors:  Mike D Tokach; Bob D Goodband; Joel M DeRouchey; Jason C Woodworth; Jordan T Gebhardt
Journal:  Anim Front       Date:  2021-02-05

8.  Strategies to improve fiber utilization in swine.

Authors:  Brian J Kerr; Gerald C Shurson
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2013-03-15

9.  Effects of the standardized ileal digestible lysine to metabolizable energy ratio on performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  Pengfei Li; Zhikai Zeng; Ding Wang; Lingfeng Xue; Rongfei Zhang; Xiangshu Piao
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-01

10.  Evaluation of nutritional strategies to slow growth rate then induce compensatory growth in 90-kg finishing pigs.

Authors:  Zhong-Xing Rao; Mike D Tokach; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey; Robert D Goodband; Jordan T Gebhardt
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.