Literature DB >> 16361021

Efficacy and safety of dexanabinol in severe traumatic brain injury: results of a phase III randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.

Andrew I R Maas1, Gordon Murray, Herbert Henney, Nadim Kassem, Valerie Legrand, Miriam Mangelus, Jan-Paul Muizelaar, Nino Stocchetti, Nachshon Knoller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury is a major cause of death and disability. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of dexanabinol, a synthetic cannabinoid analogue devoid of psychotropic activity, in severe traumatic brain injury.
METHODS: 861 patients with severe traumatic brain injury admitted to 86 specialist centres from 15 countries were included in a multi-centre, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Patients were randomised to receive a single intravenous 150 mg dose of dexanabinol or placebo within 6 h of injury. The primary outcome was the extended Glasgow outcome scale assessed at 6 months, with the point of dichotomisation into unfavourable versus favourable outcome differentiated by baseline prognostic risk. Prespecified subgroup analyses were defined by injury severity, recruitment rate, and time to dosing. Secondary analysis included control of intracranial pressure and quality of life. Analysis were prespecified in the protocol and the statistical analysis plan. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00129857.
FINDINGS: 846 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. The extended Glasgow outcome scale at 6 months did not differ between groups; 215 (50%) patients in the dexanabinol group and 214 (51%) patients in the placebo group had an unfavourable outcome (odds ratio for a favourable response 1.04; 95% CI 0.79-1.36). Improvements in the control of intracranial pressure or quality of life were not recorded and subgroup analysis showed no indication of differential treatment effects. Dexanabinol was not associated with hepatic, renal, or cardiac toxic effects.
INTERPRETATION: Dexanabinol is safe, but is not efficacious in the treatment of traumatic brain injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16361021     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70253-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  86 in total

1.  Does the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale add value to the conventional Glasgow Outcome Scale?

Authors:  James Weir; Ewout W Steyerberg; Isabella Butcher; Juan Lu; Hester F Lingsma; Gillian S McHugh; Bob Roozenbeek; Andrew I R Maas; Gordon D Murray
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Lessons from traumatic head injury for assessing functional status after brain tumour.

Authors:  J T Lindsay Wilson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  A review of neuroprotection pharmacology and therapies in patients with acute traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kevin W McConeghy; Jimmi Hatton; Lindsey Hughes; Aaron M Cook
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 4.  Neuroprotection for traumatic brain injury: translational challenges and emerging therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  David J Loane; Alan I Faden
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 14.819

5.  A method for reducing misclassification in the extended Glasgow Outcome Score.

Authors:  Juan Lu; Anthony Marmarou; Kate Lapane; Elizabeth Turf; Lindsay Wilson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 6.  Multifunctional drugs for head injury.

Authors:  Robert Vink; Alan J Nimmo
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 7.  The biomedical challenge of neurodegenerative disorders: an opportunity for cannabinoid-based therapies to improve on the poor current therapeutic outcomes.

Authors:  Javier Fernández-Ruiz
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Cannabis and Cannabinoid Biology in Stroke.

Authors:  Sang-Ho Choi; Yongshan Mou; Afonso C Silva
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Addressing the challenges of obtaining functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury research: missing data patterns, timing of follow-up, and three prognostic models.

Authors:  Leila R Zelnick; Laurie J Morrison; Sean M Devlin; Eileen M Bulger; Karen J Brasel; Kellie Sheehan; Joseph P Minei; Jeffrey D Kerby; Samuel A Tisherman; Sandro Rizoli; Riyad Karmy-Jones; Rardi van Heest; Craig D Newgard
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Dosing and safety of cyclosporine in patients with severe brain injury.

Authors:  Jimmi Hatton; Bonnie Rosbolt; Philip Empey; Richard Kryscio; Byron Young
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.115

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.