Literature DB >> 16360908

Patient- and clinician-perceived need for orthognathic surgery.

Karen J Juggins1, Fiona Nixon, Susan J Cunningham.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To better understand why patients believe they need orthognathic treatment, a study was undertaken to examine perceived need for treatment by patients and clinicians. This questionnaire-based study was undertaken at The John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty patients were recruited from combined orthodontic-surgical clinics. They were asked to rate their perceived need for treatment based on facial appearance, dental appearance, function, and overall need. Twenty orthodontists and 20 maxillofacial surgeons were asked to rate perceived need for treatment based on the same parameters, using study models and clinical photographs. Ratings were marked on visual analog scales.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found between patients and clinicians in perceived need for treatment based on facial appearance (orthodontists compared with patients, P = .023; surgeons compared with patients, P = .001). In addition, maxillofacial surgeons rated a significantly greater overall need for treatment than patients (P = .027), and they rated treatment need based on facial appearance (P = .005) and function (P < .001) significantly higher than orthodontists.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians rated greater need for orthognathic treatment based on facial appearance than did patients. Surgeons also rated greater overall need for treatment than patients. In addition, surgeons rated treatment need based on facial appearance and function significantly higher than orthodontists, but large variations existed in both clinician groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16360908     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  5 in total

1.  Patients' and dentists' perception of dental appearance.

Authors:  Christian J Mehl; Sönke Harder; Matthias Kern; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Submental-Cervical Angle: Perceived Attractiveness and Threshold Values of Desire for Surgery.

Authors:  Farhad B Naini; Martyn T Cobourne; Fraser McDonald; David Wertheim
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-12-11

3.  Association of the three-dimensional skeletal variables with self-recognition of facial asymmetry in skeletal Class III patients.

Authors:  Seung-Weon Lim; Jun-Bo Jeon; Ryu-Jin Moon; Seungwon Oh; Aehyun Park; Min-Hee Oh; Min-Seok Kim; Hyeon-Shik Hwang; Jin-Hyoung Cho
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.684

4.  Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic-Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study.

Authors:  Olivier de Waard; Robin Bruggink; Frank Baan; Hendrikus A J Reukers; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Edwin M Ongkosuwito
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Comparative study of postoperative stability between conventional orthognathic surgery and a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for skeletal class III correction.

Authors:  Deuk-Hyun Mah; Su-Gwan Kim; Ji-Su Oh; Jae-Seek You; Seo-Yun Jung; Won-Gi Kim; Kyung-Hwan Yu
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-02-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.